Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine needed to generate immune response against variants, British study: Reuters

2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine needed to generate immune response against variants, British study: Reuters



New York Times

Inside Judge Chauvin’s room: 11 of the 12 jurors were ready to be convicted immediately

Sitting at tables 6 feet apart in a hotel conference room, 12 jurors scribbled letters on leaflets indicating how they rely on a murder charge against Derek Chauvin, a former Minneapolis police officer on trial for the murder of George Floyd. When the chairman of the jury gathered the votes that morning, one of the jurors remembered that there were 1

1 “G” newspapers on them – guilty. One paper says “U” for uncertain. The seven women and five men spent the next few hours examining the evidence in one of the most closely watched trials of a generation, according to Brandon Mitchell, the only juror to publicly describe last week’s discussions near Minneapolis. Mitchell said jurors watched video footage of Floyd’s death, discussed the testimony of many witnesses and experts, and created their own schedule using markers and a whiteboard. By noon, Mitchell said, the juror, who was unsure, a white woman, had decided: Chauvin was guilty of all charges. Sign up for the New York Times Morning newsletter Mitchell, 31, a Minneapolis high school basketball coach, described the discussions in an interview Thursday, shedding light on what happened in the jury room before jurors convicted Chauvin of two counts of murder. and a charge of manslaughter. Mitchell said he was excited to be chosen for the jury and was glad to see that the jury was diverse; there were four black jurors, including Mitchell, as well as six white jurors and two multiracial jurors. They ranged in age from 20 to 60 years. “I was ready to put pressure on him,” Mitchell said. “Regardless of the way the sentence was passed – guilty or innocent – it was important for me as a black person to be in the room.” after three weeks of testimony, he found the evidence vast. “I had no doubt,” Mitchell said of his decision to blame Chauvin. Jurors discussed the case for about seven hours for two days before sentencing on the afternoon of April 20, Mitchell said. They spent much of the first night of discussions to get to know each other instead of talking about the case, he said. Chauvin, the white officer who was filmed kneeling on Floyd’s neck, a black security guard for more than nine minutes last May, is due to be convicted in June and could face decades in prison. Immediately after the closing arguments in the April 19 trial, jurors gathered in a conference room at the hotel, where they were sequestered and handed over their phones for discussion, Mitchell said. They voted on whether to keep their masks during the discussions (they unanimously chose to take them off) and soon moved on to discuss the evidence and the law. They first considered second-degree manslaughter, the least serious of the charges Chauvin was facing, and the juror, who would later point out uncertainty about the murder, said she was unsure about the manslaughter charge. Mitchell said. Sitting at separate U-shaped tables, jurors took turns describing their thoughts. The jurors decided to wait until the second day of deliberations to discuss the murder charges, but dinner did not arrive for several more hours, so instead they chatted about their work and their children. At 6:45 a.m. the next morning, lawmakers knocked on each of their hotel doors to wake them for breakfast and a second day of discussion, Mitchell said. As jurors considered the murder charges, Mitchell said they focused at one point on the exact cause of Floyd’s death. Many jurors said they believed prosecutors’ version of what happened – that Chauvin’s knee caused Floyd’s death – but at least one juror who supported the verdict said he could not be sure that Chauvin’s knee was the cause. Still, Mitchell recalled, the juror said he believed the former officer was still responsible because he continued to nail Floyd even after he lost consciousness and never received medical attention. After hours of discussions on a third-degree murder charge, all jurors said they supported the verdict, Mitchell said, and another half hour later agreed on a second-degree murder sentence. The jurors decided to wait until noon to fill out the forms that will make their decision official, Mitchell said. “We didn’t want to hurry,” he said. “We paused to soak it and said, ‘That’s what we’re going to do. “Shortly before 2 pm, they warned the deputies that they had reached a verdict and were taken from the hotel to the courtroom, where Judge Peter A. Cahill read the verdict. Mitchell said that for many jurors, including himself, the most powerful witness testimony came from Dr. Martin J. Tobin, a lung expert who said he indicated the exact moment Floyd took his last breath. “He just got our full attention 100%,” Mitchell told Tobin, who testified about the indictment. “I don’t know if there’s another witness who caught us like that.” Mitchell said he had found the defense team’s case weak, lacking revealing evidence that could make holes in the prosecution’s case. “I was waiting for a moment that would culminate as ‘Wow!’ “-” Boom! AHA! moment – and it just never happened, “said Mitchell. “Nothing has ever been hit. It was kind of deflation. Make things easier. “Cahill said the jurors’ identities would be kept secret at least until October, although they are free to speak in public if they choose. One of the two deputy jurors who attended the trial but was apologized before the discussions began. , speaking publicly, saying he never doubted Chauvin was guilty.During the trial, jurors referred to each other only by the numbers of their jurors – Mitchell was number 52 – until discussions began and they shared their names. Mitchell said he and the other jurors had plans to get together for a drink in the summer or fall, when the case no longer attracted as much attention, and Mitchell said he was determined not to watch the video in the weeks after Floyd’s death of Chauvin, who knelt on Floyd’s neck but saw part of it when it began airing automatically on a social media show. polis after Floyd’s death, Mitchell, who lived downtown, said he often discussed the killings with high school students on the teams he coached to help them express the anger and sadness they felt. He said he found the protests justified and necessary and hoped they would bring about change. “I just want to see the police be more compassionate when it comes to blacks, instead of moving with such aggression,” he said. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. © 2021 The New York Times Company


Source link