New PhD programs we fund combine scientific excellence with commitment to commitment of work environment for trainees.
Today we announce the awards for our reconstructed PhD programs. 127 million pounds will be for 23 programs in 15 institutions across the country.
For the first time, when evaluating programs, we challenged ourselves to take into account not only the excellence of science that the programs would provide, but also the culture of the research environment in which students would be trained.
Like any new way of working, it had its challenges. But also two things became clear.
Differences in science and culture can exist side by side. Each of the programs funded is built on high-quality research training that will explore a wide range of exciting topics, from understanding the internal workings of individual cell types to the public health economy, from plant nutrition to scientific health data.
At the same time, we have seen new ways we can work together as a community to bring science and culture together, putting both of us at the heart of what we do.
1. Supporting Research Environment
Successful programs have demonstrated thoughtful approaches to diversity and demonstrated how they will integrate overall support for the personal, professional and technical development of students from all backgrounds during, during and after their doctoral studies.
We funded programs that most effectively demonstrate how students will be supported to develop broad research knowledge through a range of partnerships and networks, including "silos switching" and collaboration opportunities.
2. Quality Supervision
Successful programs prioritize high-quality student-leader relationships. All of them had a strong ethos of equal partnerships between students and their supervisor.
There were also plans for supervisory and support teams to undergo training and to evaluate the effectiveness of this. And it focused on personalized development planning and support for student transition.
3. Student-centered Approach
The best way to improve programs and ensure that they meet the needs of students is to listen and work with the students themselves.
Successful programs are evidence of sound plans to integrate student feedback in the ongoing development of a program and to develop support for mental health and well-being, for example through confidential feedback and exit interviews. And all programs committed to publishing student data openly.
Tell us what is important to you
How do you think the culture of research can be improved? Take our survey to let us know your views.
4. Share Practice
Our funded program group is committed to being part of a developing community of practitioners who will develop and share a practice. We want to be open to success, but also to the challenges.
Assessing the Approach
This is a new approach for Wellcome.
We will appreciate the way we evaluate the programs. We also commissioned independent research to look at how our strategy was developed, how we communicated the call and decision-making processes.
We will share what we learn. Follow our website and our social media channels, especially Twitter .
And we are always glad to hear and learn from others. Please contact me at email@example.com to discuss further.
- Dynamic Molecular Cell Biology (University of Bristol)
- Molecular Genetic and Life Pathology (University of Bristol)
- Biology and Medicine (19659035] Biology and Medicine (19659035) of Cambridge)
- Integrated Molecular, Cellular and Translational Biology (University of Dundee)
- Plants, Food and Health (University of East Anglia)
- Hosts, Pathogens and Global Health (University of Edinburgh)
- cellular mechanisms (University of Edinburgh)
- A healthy n disease model: science, ethics and society (University of Edinburgh)
- Translational neuroscience (University of Edinburgh)  Integrative infection biology: mechanisms and disease control (Glasgow University)
- Health Science data (Health Data Research UK)
- Advanced Therapies for Regenerative Medicine (King & # 39; s College London)  Neuro-immune interactions in health and disease (King & # 39; s College London)
- Genomic Epidemiology and Genomics of Public Health (University of Leicester)
- Immunomatrix in Complex Disease (University of Leicester) Manchester)
- Drug Discovery and Science Teams (University of Nottingham)
- Cell Structural Biology (University of Oxford)
- Cell Chemistry: New Technologies for the Study of Complex Biology and Medicine (University of Oxford)
- ] Genomic medicine and statistics (University of Oxford)
- Health data in practice: a human-oriented science (Queen Mary University of London)
- Assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prevention policies and strategies that reduce workload non – communicable diseases and health inequalities (Univers tet Sheffield)
- Biology (University College London)
- Science of Mental Health (University College London)