Like other suits that have been filed, it claims the Sakler family has accumulated wealth by using fraudulent trading to sell addictive and potentially lethal painkillers. "Eight people in one family have made the choice that has caused much of the opioid epidemic," says the claim, and then name the eight defendants.
"As they control their own private pharmaceutical company, Sakler's accused are the power to decide how to sell addictive drugs, give more opioid patients at higher doses, longer than ever before, pay billions dollars, are responsible for addiction, overdose, and death that have harmed millions of lives. They have to be held accountable now. "
The case does not specify the amount of cash claims sought, the courts try to take a number of actions, to make Sackers issue "corrective advertising statements" in national and regional publications, medical journals, TV shows and websites, childcare for opioid addicts and physical and psychological treatment. has decreased in some areas due to the drug outbreak
The Family and the Response of the Company
Mortimer and Raymond Sacler, the late founders of the company, issued this statement:
"These unfounded claims place the accusation where it does not belong to a complex public health crisis and we deny it." The company our fathers and grandfathers founded approved FDA medicine, which has always been a small part of the opiates market – never more than four percent of the conventional opiates prescriptions in the country and currently less than two percent – while providing relief for the lives of millions patients who need it
"While we have always acted correctly, we remain committed to make a significant contribution to life-saving solutions by preventing the diversion and abuse of prescription medicines and the treatment of these who are suffering from addiction. "
" This complaint is part of a constant effort by the lawyer to collect emergency fees to highlight Purdy, blaming him for the entire opioid crisis in the United States, and trying the case in court but instead of the judiciary, "said Purdue's spokesman Bob Joseph.
The statement says the case is inaccurate and misleading. For example, according to the company, the application does not mention that Purdue opioid pain medications account for less than 2% of the total prescriptions for opiates.
Purdue Pharma also does not give credit to Purdue Pharma for its efforts to reduce opioid dependence
"Purdue Pharma and individual former directors vigorously denied the allegations in the complaint and will continue to defend themselves against these misleading claims. At the same time, Purdue continues to struggle for balance in public discourse so that society can simultaneously help sick patients in need and create real solutions to the complex addictive problem. "
8 tribes of American Indians unite
The suit was filed on March 18 in the Southern District of New York. Denoted as accused are Richard S. Sacler, Jonathan D. Sacler, Mortimer DA. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Beverly Sacler, Teresa Sackler, David A. Sakler, Trust for members of Raymond Sackler and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals.
The applicants include areas severely affected by the opioid crisis, ranging from heavily populated areas such as Cleveland to small towns such as Op, Alabama. There are 112 Massachusetts towns and districts among the plaintiffs and 51 in Kentucky. Eight American tribes are also among the plaintiffs.
The petition claims that the number of overdose deaths in the US has risen from 47,000 in 2014 to 72,000 in 2017, three out of five deaths involving opiates
The claim says the family is increasing sales by creating a "new" health story – one in which opioids are considered safe and effective for long-term use, and pain is treated aggressively at all costs.
The claim says the family and its companies "deliberately mislead doctors and patients" to use prescription opioids safely through sales representatives and through "financial dealings with academic doctors, professional societies, hospitals, trade associations for state medical advice, and first look
The claim also requires defendants to pay the fees of the plaintiffs' lawyers