FaceApp. That's it. The application has become viral once again after two years or so. The effect has become better, but these applications, like many other viral applications, tend to come and move in waves driven by impact networks or paid promotions. For the first time, we looked at this particular intellectual property editor from a team of Russian developers about two years ago.
Now it again became viral due to some features that allow you to edit a person's face to look older or younger. Maybe you remember at one point that he had a problem because he allowed a digital black color by changing a person from one ethnicity to another
In this current wave of virus, some new questions are about FaceApp. The first is whether you upload your roll in the background. We have not found any evidence of this and neither the security researcher nor the executive director of Guardian App Will Straphach or researcher Baptist Robert . access the application. You can see a video about this behavior here:
While the app really lets you pick one photo without giving it access to your photo library, it's actually 100% enabled by the Apple API introduced in iOS 11 . It allows a programmer to let the user choose a photo from the system's dialog box to let the app work. You can review the documentation here and here.
As the user has to touch a picture, this provides something Apple has: the user's intention. You've explicitly listened to it, so it's good to send this photo. This behavior is actually good good in my opinion. It allows you to give an application a photo instead of your entire library. You can not see any of your photos until you touch it. This is far better than making your entire library in apps for jokes
Unfortunately, there is still some cognitive dissonance because Apple allows the app to call this API even if user has been set to Access Photo to Level in the settings. In my opinion, if you set it to Never, you need to change this before every photo can get into the application from your library, no matter what inconvenience it is causing. Never is not by default, this is an explicit choice and the user's constant intentions reject the one-time user intentions of the new photo choice.
I believe Apple must find a way to fix this future by making it clearer or forbidden if people explicitly give up sharing photos in an app.
A good idea might be the equivalent of the "once-only" option added to the upcoming iOS 13 may be appropriate.
One thing FaceApp does, however, is uploading your photo to the cloud for processing. It does not process the device, as does Apple's first application and similarly allows third parties through its libraries and routines. This is not clear to the user.
I asked FaceApp why they did not warn the user that the photo was processed in the cloud. Besides, I asked them if they kept the photos.
Given how many screen shots people make with sensitive information such as banking, etc., access to photos is a greater security risk than ever before. Using optical character recognition technology, you can automatically retrieve a huge amount of information beyond "people's photos."
So, in general, I think it's important to think carefully about precautions introduced to protect photographic archives and the motives and methods of the apps that we have access to.