Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Amazon responds to Parler’s lawsuit by claiming that it does not want to and cannot remove violent content

Amazon responds to Parler’s lawsuit by claiming that it does not want to and cannot remove violent content



Amazon responded to the attack on Parler on Tuesday after an alternative social media site filed a lawsuit against the corporate giant this week after it was shut down by Amazon Web Services.

Parler entered its third offline day on Wednesday after Amazon Web Services cut off the platform from its cloud hosting service after a deadly riot last week in the US Capitol.

“This is not about suppressing speech or stifling views. This is not a conspiracy to restrict trade,”

; Amazon Web Services said in response to Parler’s lawsuit. Instead, it is the demonstrated reluctance and inability of Parler to remove from public Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) servers content that endangers public safety, such as by inciting and planning the rape, torture and murder of said government officials and private individuals. citizens. “

Ticker Security Last Change Change%
AMZN AMAZON.COM INC. 3,120.83 +6.62 + 0.21%

Amazon Web Services said it had repeatedly told Parler that the site’s content violated the two companies’ agreement. The suspension is a “last resort” to block access to violent content, AWS said, “including plans for violence to disrupt the upcoming presidential transition.”

READ AMAZON’S ANSWER

“There is no legal basis in AWS’s client agreements or otherwise forcing AWS to host content of this nature,” the response said.

Parler is seeking a temporary remand order to prevent Amazon Web Services from making it difficult for Parler. He claims that AWS violates Sherman’s antitrust law in the statement, stating that AWS has an agreement with rival Twitter.

This illustration shows the logo of the Parler social media app shown on a smartphone with its website in the background in Arlington, Virginia on July 2, 2020. (Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY / AFP via Getty Images) (OLIVIER DOULIERY / AFP via Getty Images)

AWS claims in the statement that the temporary detention measure will limit its ability to respond to violent content websites.

EPIK SAYS IT DIDN’T DISCUSS PARLER HOSTING AGAINST DOMAIN REGISTRATION

The lawsuit comes as Google and Apple have also taken action against Parler following the protest against Trump in the US Capitol. Google suspended Peter from its app store on Friday for failing to moderate “delightful content” posted by users linked to the violent siege last week.

AWS said it did not host the Twitter feed and “could not stop accessing Twitter content” after the hashtag “#hangmikepence” became Twitter.

Parler also accused Amazon Web Services of breach of contract, and Amazon denied the charge.

GET THE FOX BUSINESS, CLICK HERE

“Despite Parler’s rhetoric, the lawsuit is nothing more than a priceless lawsuit for breach of contract. But the facts are clear: if there’s a breach, it’s the demonstrated failure and Parler’s inability to identify and remove such content,” Amazon Web Services said. the answer.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ABOUT FOX BUSINESS

Talia Kaplan, Audrey Conklin, James Leggate and Brittany De Lea of ​​FOX Business contributed to this report


Source link