قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Health https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ An Electromagnetic Health Crisis

An Electromagnetic Health Crisis




<div _ngcontent-c15 = "" innerhtml = "

If living beings have always been exposed to natural electromagnetic fields, and their bodies produce electric currents as well, why is there a growing concern about human-made electromagnetic fields?

Introduction

Exposure to the electromagnetic field is not a new phenomenon for living beings. fields, the growing sources, applications, and impact of human-made electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) on humans and the environment are creating more questions than answers.

This is extraordinarily complex to evaluate when all living beings are & nbsp; technically electromagnetic and every thought and emotion is a measurable frequency as well.Also, even in the absence of external electric fields, there is a presen ce of tiny electrical currents in living beings due to the numerous chemical reactions that occur as part of the healthy living bodily functions. According to a WHO report, the heart is electrically active and nerves relay signals by transmitting electrical impulses. Furthermore, since all human body systems & nbsp; are regulated by & nbsp; EMF signals, it is essential to evaluate not only how biologically active human-made electric and magnetic fields affect humans, but also how it affects all living beings in the cellular level.

To date, the most critical criterion used to understand whether any particular radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is dangerous has been in the category of & nbsp; ionizing or non-ionizing radiation. & Nbsp; But, this is still useful and valid today, as we begin to evaluate the extremely low frequency of electromagnetic radiation on living beings?

Acknowledging this emerging reality, Risk Group initiated a much-needed discussion on “Electromagnetic Fields and Health Risks” with Dr. Nicolaos Alexopoulos on Risk Roundup .

Disclosure: I am the CEO of Risk Group LLC.

Risk Group discusses “Electromagnetic fields and Health Risks” with Former Dean and Emeritus Professor (Dr) Nicolaos Alexopoulos from the University of California, Irvine; a member of the New York Academy of Sciences, an ISI Highly Cited Author in Computer Science with more than 270 professional journals and conference papers, and a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), recipient of the IEEE Schelkunoff Best Journal Publication Award, and currently at Broadcom Foundation based in the United States.

Man-Made Electromagnetic Field

It seems that all types of human-made EMFs and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) are in contrast to natural EMFs / EMR, are polarized . Polarized EMFs / EMRs may have increased biological activity, possibly due to their ability to generate constructive interference forces, which magnify their concentrations at many places. This in turn also powers all charged / polar molecules – especially free ions within and around all living cells – to move back and forth on parallel planes in phase with the polarized field concerned. According to Panagopoulos et al. (2015) in Nature “such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membranes electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell's electrochemical balance. Consequently, these features render human-made EMFs / EMRs more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs / EMRs ”. As a result, there is a growing concern that biologically active human-made electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) may be at the root of some mounting health concerns for humans. Which brings us to some questions:

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Does polarization explain the ever-increasing number of biological effects discovered and documented during the past few decades generated by human-made EMFs?

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Is polarization the trigger that extensively increases the probability of initiating biological / health effects of living beings?

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; does polarization affect human health?

According to a research study done by Prof. James E. Trosko at Michigan State University, “electromagnetic fields, similar to those found in overhead power lines, can have a biological effect on human cells, an effect that could contribute to the complex cellular process that leads to cancer.” to an important question: do we sufficiently understand how biologically active electric and magnetic fields impact living beings at cellular levels?

5G

Over the years, there have been many studies to understand the role of extremely low-frequency EMF exposures from conventional power sources and home appliances. According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences report “while some of these studies showed a possible link between EMF field strength and increased risk for childhood & nbsp; leukemia, their findings indicated that such an association was weak.

Now, in a rapidly changing digital age, with wireless routers, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, 5G, the Internet of Things, radio and TV signals, mobile phones, and more, the applications and sources of EMF are proliferating. As a result, fears are amplifying about the possible connections between EMF and adverse health effects on humans, other living beings, and the environment. Based on the thousands of published reports there are growing concerns about radiofrequency radiation that can (and) damage the DNA of any biological species and lead to cancer ; (ii) cause oxidative damage that can cause premature aging; (ii) disrupt cell metabolism ; and (iv) potentially leading to other diseases through the generation of stress proteins.

Potential Health Risks

When the main effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is accepted to be the heating of body tissues, it is essential to understand and evaluate:

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; What does the low exposure of human-made EMFs to living beings?

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; How does the human-made EMFs react at the cellular level?

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Why is there a need for a human-made electromagnetic field study from an evolutionary perspective?

● & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; EMP protection?

What Next?

As we evaluate why human-made EMFs are more bioactive than natural electromagnetic fields, there may be more questions than answers. & Nbsp; Since biological effects are measurable responses to an electromagnetic stimulus or a change in the environment, should we not put efforts towards having a sufficient understanding of the impact of human-made electromagnetic fields on biology at a cellular level? The time is now to discuss and debate the health risks of human-made electromagnetic fields.

NEVER MISS ANY OF DR. PANDYA'S POSTS

Join here for a regular update.

">

If living beings have always been exposed to natural electromagnetic fields, and their bodies produce electric currents as well, why is there a growing concern about human-made electromagnetic fields?

Introduction

Exposure to the electromagnetic field is not a new phenomenon for living beings.

This is extraordinarily complex to evaluate when all living beings are to natural electromagnetic fields, the growing sources, applications, and impact of human-made electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) on humans and the environment. technically electromagnetic, and every thought and emotion is a measurable frequency as well.Also, even in the absence of external electric fields, there is a presence of tiny electric al currents in living beings due to numerous chemical reactions that occur as part of healthy living bodily functions. According to a WHO report, the heart is electrically active and nerves relay signals by transmitting electrical impulses. Furthermore, since all human body systems are regulated by EMF signals, it is essential to evaluate not only how biologically active human-made electric and magnetic fields affect humans, but also how it affects all living beings at the cellular level.

To date, the most critical criterion used to understand whether any particular radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is dangerous has been the category of ionizing or non-ionizing radiation. But, is this still useful and valid today, as we begin to evaluate the extremely low frequency of electromagnetic radiation on living beings?

Acknowledging this emerging reality, the Risk Group initiated a much-needed discussion on “Electromagnetic Fields and Health Risks” with Dr. Nicolaos Alexopoulos on Risk Roundup.

Disclosure: I am the CEO of Risk Group LLC.

Risk Group discusses “Electromagnetic fields and Health Risks” with Former Dean and Emeritus Professor (Dr. ) Nicolaos Alexopoulos from the University of California, Irvine; a member of the New York Academy of Sciences, an ISI Highly Cited Author in Computer Science with more than 270 professional journals and conference papers, and a Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), recipient of the IEEE Schelkunoff Best Journal Publication Award, and currently at Broadcom Foundation based in the United States.

Man-Made Electromagnetic Field

It seems that all types of human-made EMFs and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) are in contrast to natural EMFs / EMRs are polarized. Polarized EMFs / EMRs may have increased biological activity, possibly due to their ability to generate constructive interference forces, which magnify their concentrations at many places. This in turn also powers all charged / polar molecules – especially free ions within and around all living cells – to move back and forth on parallel planes in phase with the polarized field concerned. According to Panagopoulos et al. (2015) in Nature, “such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on cell membrane sensors electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of cell's electrochemical balance. Consequently, these features render human-made EMFs / EMRs more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs / EMRs ”. As a result, there is growing concern that biologically active human-made electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) may be at the root of some mounting health concerns for humans. Which brings us to some questions:

● Does polarization explain the ever-increasing number of biological effects discovered and documented during the past decades generated by human-made EMFs?

● Is polarization the trigger that extensively increases the likelihood of initiation of biological / health effects of living beings?

● How does polarization affect human health?

According to a research study done by Prof. James E. Trosko at Michigan State University, “electromagnetic fields, similar to those found in overhead power lines, can have a biological effect on human cells, an effect that could contribute to the complex cellular process that leads to cancer.” to an important question: do we sufficiently understand how biologically active electric and magnetic fields impact living beings at cellular levels?

5G

Over the years, there have been many studies to understand the role of extremely low-frequency EMF exposures from conventional power sources and home appliances. According to a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences report, “while some of these studies have shown a possible link between EMF field strength and increased risk for childhood leukemia, their findings indicated that such an association was weak.”

Now, in a rapidly changing digital age, with wireless routers, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, 5G, the Internet of Things, radio and TV signals, mobile phones, and more, the applications and sources of EMF are proliferating. As a result, fears are amplifying about the possible connections between EMF and adverse health effects on humans, other living beings, and the environment. Based on the thousands of published reports, there are growing concerns about radiofrequency radiation that can (i) damage the DNA of any biological species and lead to cancer; (ii) cause oxidative damage that can cause premature aging; (ii) disrupt cell metabolism; and (iv) potentially leading to other diseases through the generation of stress proteins.

Potential Health Risks

When the main effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is accepted to be the heating of body tissues, it is essential to understand and evaluate:

● What does the low exposure of human-

● How does the human-made EMFs react at the cellular level?

● Do human beings need EMP protection?

● Do living beings need EMP protection?

What Next?

As we evaluate why human-made EMFs are more bioactive than natural electromagnetic fields, there may be more questions than answers. Because biological effects are measurable responses to an electromagnetic stimulus or change in the environment, should we not put efforts toward having a sufficient understanding of the impact of human-made electromagnetic fields on biology at a cellular level? The time is now to discuss and debate the health risks of human-made electromagnetic fields.

NEVER MISS ANY OF DR. PANDYA'S POSTS

Join here for a regular update.


Source link