A controversial Qualcomm patent covers technology that allows a smartphone to quickly connect to the internet once the device is turned on. Another is related to graphics processing and battery life. The third concerns the technology that redirects traffic between the phone's application processor and the modem.
$ 31 million in compensation is a drop in Apple bucket, a company that briefly became a $ 1 trillion last year. But this marks an important victory for Qualcomm by smoothing out its reputation as an innovator in mobile components. The victory also trusted the idea that much of the company's innovation is reflected in the iPhone.
The decision sets the foundations for a long-awaited process between the two companies scheduled for next month in San Diego. Qualcomm's patent-related dispute with Apple is worth billions of dollars and will be a recurrence in the large-scale legal gang of technological giants. The clash between Apple and Qualcomm began two years ago when the Federal Trade Commission, using Apple and Intel, blamed Qualcomm for a monopoly on modem chips. The FTC claims that Qualcomm's royalties prevent competitors from entering the market and raising phone prices. This process takes place in January and the countries are waiting for a solution.
The lawsuit next month will also examine Qualcomm's licensing business.
The patent, which was decided on Thursday by US District Judge Dana Sabrau, is more technical and less high than the other parts of the judicial battle. However, this could have consequences for how the phone is made and how much it costs.
Qualcomm's general adviser Don Rosenberg welcomed the decision.
"Today's unanimous jury decision is the last victory in our global patent process aimed at keeping Apple responsible for using our valuable technologies without paying for them," he said. "The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are those that have enabled Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly."
Apple said she was "disappointed" by the verdict. more than trying to distract from the bigger problems they face, investigating their business practices in the US federal court and around the world, "a spokesman said.
Both sides spent much of the process fighting Apple claims that one of its engineers at the time, Arjuna Shiva, has contributed significantly to the technology, and must be mentioned in the patent, Apple said Qualcomm had stolen the idea when the two companies are working together to bring chips off Qualcomm, the process had an amazing turn over this week, when Shiva, who now works for Google at first glancethen to
The jury affected Apple's argument that Shiva (19459006), Apple's adviser Huinita Brooks said the "true motivation" for the lawsuit is a retaliation for the fact that the lawsuit is not just patent-related. Apple, which took Intel as a second chip provider in 2016. She said Qualcomm was upset because two It is companies before
Now Intel shifts into Qualcomm iPhones.
"Qualcomm went into a drawer, cleaned old patents and threw them on the wall to see if they would stick to it," I said. In response, Qualcomm's advisor David Nelson said, "We have a right to return to our intellectual property."