“It was not only embarrassing, but disrespectful,” said Nina Turner, a former co-chair of the Sanders campaign who was a member of the commission. “It’s disgusting, embarrassing, unacceptable. And there is no way to restore the faith of people who already suspect that the Democratic Party is unfair. “
Another person at the meeting described it as a complete cross-talk between a small number of people in both Biden and Sanders camps, which made it difficult to listen to the procedure, and said some people did not know how to use the mute button.
The Democratic National Committee did not respond immediately to requests for comment. An employee of Biden disputed the bill from the appointed Sanders.
“It simply came to our notice then. There was a small group drowning speakers, and this continued in homage to the late rapper. John Lewis, “said the man, who declined to speak on the recording. “They were also asked to stop by Sanders and Biden delegates. And the predominant undertaking of this meeting was the five resolutions that were adopted unanimously as a result of the hard work of the Sanders and Biden teams. “
The spitting began when Brent Welder, appointed by the Sanders Committee on Congressional Rules, proposed a resolution to change the party̵
Biden’s appointed appointee requested the import, which some Sanders’ appointees said led them to be protected. “Tabling until when?” Welder asked.
“In general, until someone makes a successful proposal to remove him from the table,” said former reputation Barney Frank, co-chair of the meeting. “After the committee expires, if no one has moved to remove him successfully from the table, then he dies with the committee.”
“Wow, that doesn’t make any sense at all,” Welder said.
Gillian Johnson, who was appointed by Sanders to the committee, said other Sanders supporters were calling for the proposal to be put to a vote in the closed-door breach room by changing the background images on their screens to reflect their support. She said some of Biden’s appointees had punished progressives over him.
“You’re acting like children,” someone said, “and you were going to lose anyway, so get over it,” she said. “And then the host just closed the match so we wouldn’t see each other again.”
Welder and another Sanders nominee, who requested anonymity, also said Biden’s appointees made the comments. Turner said she heard them too, and said they came from Biden recruits or “party breathers.”
Minutes before the end of the meeting, the committee held a vote to consider Welder’s proposal, which was supported. His original amendment was then defeated.
While the powerlessness of Sanders’ recruits was followed on social media, the real arguments in the private break-in rooms were not broadcast live – a boon to the party. If the meeting had been held in person, as the Rules Committee usually does, such sections could be taped.
On a separate issue, the rules committee reached an agreement Thursday between Sanders’ and Biden’s teams to extend party reforms agreed after the disputed 2016 election.
The Rules Committee voted unanimously to submit a proposal to maintain the “advance made” in the presidential nomination process, such as not allowing super-delegates to vote in the first ballot and make the causes more accessible.
The Sanders and Biden camps hoped the resolution would emphasize party harmony. The reforms,, which will now go to the vote of delegates to the convention, will be cemented for the presidential primary 2024.
In an effort to maintain unity, Sanders ‘2020 employees asked Sanders’ appointees to step down and vote against some of the changes because they contradicted a deal made with Biden’s team.
The plan to limit the role of superdelegates to a permanent one was defeated by the committee.
“The rules adopted today, which preserve the important changes we insisted on four years ago, ensure that our party’s presidential candidate is elected by Democrats, not party elites,” Sanders said in a statement. “I want to thank Biden’s campaign, the delegates and the committee members who signed this agreement. What is being said is very simple, that the will of the people must come first.”