Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Entertainment https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Blues singer Lady A files a counterclaim against Lady Antebellum

Blues singer Lady A files a counterclaim against Lady Antebellum



It has been two months since we last registered in the battle between the blues singer Anita “Lady A”

; White and the country band Lady Antebellum (which decided to change their name to Lady A back in June although there was already a woman performing that name). The two sides met to discuss how to proceed in June, as the group proudly stated that they both agreed to share the name although Lady A’s initial conclusion was just that she he would continue to use the name, and he didn’t care what the band did. A month later, the group decided to sue herwhich – let’s be completely fair here –they made them look like assholes. In the best case. Something much worse at worst. (Let’s not forget that this is the black woman they are judging, and the reason they were changed by Lady Antebelum in the first place was because they finally realized that the old name could be interpreted as a fond memory of the days before the Civil War in the American South, known even when slavery was still legal.)

Lady A replied shortly afterwards, but now Rolling stone he says it went on to file a counterclaim against the group, claiming that it had “national rights” to the Lady A trademark and that its use preceded “all rights in the Lady A trademark allegedly owned by Lady Antebellum”. (In their costume, the band claims to have used Lady A as a nickname for years, although it seems to only appear in situations where people can’t be bothered to spell their full name.) Lady A also claims that this whole “is overshadowed the demand for it on social media and music services “, which led to” lost sales, reduced brand identity and reduced value and goodwill associated with the brand “.

The group filed a lawsuit only after Lady A requested a $ 10 million deal in exchange for allowing them to use the name. Rolling stone noting that she says she did so only after deciding that the group did not take her objections seriously enough. Meanwhile, the group’s claim does not seek money or compensation, but only serves to establish that the group can use the name and that Lady A cannot sue them for it later (which she is now doing).


Source link