LONDON – After voting "no" so many times, the British Parliament may be ready to vote "on something.
On Monday, Parliament will again try to take the lead from Prime Minister Teresa May, as the House of Commons will vote on four proposals to leave the European Union.
Among the best options are two that would call for a much softer Brexit than May, which provides.
Both proposals will see that Britain will remain closely related to European trade rules and tariff regimes. One option would mean that the UK will give up its ability to control European immigration. The other is likely to keep Britain from starting its own independent commercial transactions.
Commercial experts describing both options say they can deliver a kind of "ultra-soft" Brexit who sees Britain "take a little back
Another popular option may force the government to hold a second referendum to takes up the question of how or whether to go back to people.
And the fourth is essentially trying to cancel Brexit. will be non-binding "indicative votes" expressing the will of Parliament. An earlier round of votes failed to produce a majority for none of the eight proposals last week. But a major change from the Labor Party and other political maneuvers could change math on Monday night.
All this comes amid rising signs that the British Prime Minister has lost control of Brexit, her party and her cabinet.
The Conservative Party was a rebellion. Over the weekend, a block of 170 conservatives, including 10 Cabinet ministers, wrote to May asking Britain to leave the UK. "With or without a deal," according to the London Sunday Times
Her cabinet, meanwhile, now consists of convicts for coup and direct competitors. HARDYNY BREYEXTYTERS and those ministers who insist on a softer Brexer threaten to resign if they do not make their way
The government secretaries have become so rebellious that May's main whip, Julian Smith, rarely records an interview with B BBC describes them as "the worst example of poor discipline in the office of British political history."
Smith's courageous statement of unprecedented bad behavior was not only remarkable for what he said-but who said it.
The main scourges should be like Victorian children in extreme conditions, never seen or heard. They are almost invisible to the world outside the Westminster Palace and their only job is to impose party discipline; in other words, to "throw" their members – by text and group WhatsApp – to vote in one way or another.
In his remarks, Smith also said that after the results of the general election in 2017, when the Conservative Party drastically lost in its parliamentary majority, it must have been clear that the result would be a milder Brexit.
Instead, May made bold speeches and raised red lines.
Still, May could still make it. Her supporters say the prime minister is likely to try the fourth time to get it through the House of Commons
Why do MEPs vote in favor of a fourth vote what they have rejected three times before? May's last threat: If her conservative members do not gather around her, she will call general elections.
This seems an empty threat from the weakened party leader. Partly because recent opinion polls show that the opposition Labor Party is searching for the Torres, although work is divided equally between "leaving" and "remaining". In this environment, it is difficult to see the conservatives who help to secure a majority of two-thirds.
Last week, May said she would withdraw if her deal eventually somehow crosses the finish line, thus allowing someone else to take the reins in the second phase of the Brexit talks. She can be replaced as a government leader by her own party, without the need for general elections.
In a short while, Boris Johnson, a former foreign minister and favorite who replaced May as conservative leader, withdrew his opposition and backed May's deal.
"We have to do Brexit because we have so much more to do, and so much more that the Conservative Party unites us than it divides us," Johnson wrote on Monday at the Daily Telegraph, which sounded like a leadership proposal.
"We have so many achievements we can be proud of – and yet everyone is silenced in Brexix's cacophony," Johnson said.
On Monday, Parliament had to discuss more than 6 million citizens first.
On Monday evening, Parliament will renew its attempt to find an alternative to the May agreement.
A soft option by Brexit may include a commitment to remain in a "permanent customs union" with the EU – such an arrangement allows those within the Union to trade freely without tariffs but sets an external tariff for all commodities entering the block . Such a deal would make it difficult for the UK to go global and reduce its own commercial transactions abroad as it will be locked in the EU. tariff regimes. But it can control European immigration.
Another soft version of Brexit is the Norwegian-style relationship, which includes staying in the US. single or common market. This time, it can allow the UK to seek commercial transactions outside the EU, but it will probably mean that the UK will have to allow the free movement of the EU.
When Parliament held a similar series of "indicative votes" last week, closest to the customs union, which lost only six votes.
Some conservatives remain deeply opposed to these opportunities, partly because they only see it as "Brexit by name", crossing all their red lines – preventing Britain from entering into new commercial deals with countries like the United States and China, while the borders remain wide open to European migrants.
Steve Baker, Conservative MP and Arch Brexiteer, is one of those who strongly oppose. He told the BBC that joining the opposition parties and supporting a vote of no confidence in the May government is "at the table" if the government adopts this option.
Ken Clark, a conservative veteran lawmaker who proposed the customs union, told the BBC that this opportunity would really restrict the UK in its ability to negotiate third-country tariff concessions. He stressed, however, that the UK could enter into commercial transactions for services, which make up about 80% of the British economy. He added that some of Brexiteers, supporting the benefits of Global Britain, are generating new business deals with countries like America that "carry".
The idea that "Donald Trump will surprise us suddenly with joy because he is so happy we have damaged the European Union. That's all stupid, "Clark said.