Calorie tracking can be a dull job. Although food tracking applications have made the task much easier than the pen and paper alternative, manually entering every bite, slipping and sipping into a smartphone can still be felt as an unwanted penetration into the diet. Tracking a sweet profit, the number of start-ups has quickly plunged into the market with its own set of calorie counting gadgets. There is Spün, the intelligent spoon and application that promises to automatically recognize how many calories you consume in each bite while the "smart glass" Vessyl has won the titles of breathless release before it quickly gets to the starting cemetery without ever reaching the hands .
But perhaps the application-based calorie counter does not need to be replaced. According to a new article published in the scientific journal Obesity people only need to spend 14.6 minutes a day to monitor their calorie intake to keep up with their weight.
The authors of the study found that the frequency that someone had observed their intake resulted in successful weight loss, not for the time spent or the level of detail recorded. This is key because one of the main reasons why people think calories are so difficult is that they see it as a big sink.
The study involved 142 people who were asked to register their daily intake for six months – a detailed description of calories, fat, portions, and methods of preparation. The most successful participants, those who have lost 10% of their body weight, are those who are consistent in their reports, enter three or more times a day.
By the end of the program, they spend less than 15 minutes. recording their activity. This confirms the findings of earlier studies, says Jean Harvey, chairman of the department of nutrition and nutrition at the University of Vermont and lead author of the study. "We were not surprised by the observation that regular reporters are doing better, but we have never been able to check that before," she said.
The lack of time that participants had to spend on a diet, however, surprise Researchers: "There have been several earlier studies that have established that nutritional details are not as important, but we were still a little surprised that the time needed to record "enough" to be successful is so small, "said Harvey.