Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Crime is all politics and here is the latest news

Crime is all politics and here is the latest news

Voting fell almost entirely on party lines. It was 232-196. Four MPs did not vote. Two Democrats voted no and one former Republican – Independent Justin Amash of Michigan, who was depleted of the party for his impeachment support – votes with Democrats.

Van Drew said he believed the investigation would "divide the country further." Without bilateral support.

Peterson called Parliament's vote on the resolution "unnecessary" and stated that "he will not decide on impeachment until all the facts have been presented."

Both districts are more Republican according to 538 and both are voted for Trump in 201
6 according to a database maintained by the liberal Daily Kos website. Other Democrats in similar constituencies have fallen in line with the party impeachment movement.

The danger to the Democrats in impeachment

And this is a good reminder to Democrats that they have a majority because of historic turnout in 2018, and also because they turned counties that were previously held by Republicans and voted for President Donald Trump in 2016.

The great danger of impeachment efforts for Democrats is that he turns voters into these key constituencies against them.

Miguel Marquez on CNN spent time in Pennsylvania talking to voters and found that Democrats want to get an impression, and Republicans don't. He even found Democrats wondering if it was a waste of time.

Is it worth it?

Scott Jennings, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, puts it very well: "Let me jump to the end: The House of Representatives of the US Democratic majority is almost certain to impose an Imperial President Donald Trump. The Senate with a majority of Republicans in a guerrilla way would almost certainly justify it. "

The danger to Democrats in bankruptcy

The counterargument is that there is an equal or greater danger of not holding Trump accountable. This is certainly a debate that Democrats have in real time as they move.

CNN Political Director David Chalian directs us to a freshman Democratic congressman named Andy Kim. twice, and Trump won in 2016 [19659015] Kim immediately sent an explanation to her supporters on her vote on the impeachment request.

  • "Any decision I made on this subject was not created to play a role in any political games, but as it is morally right ", says Kim in a note.
  • And, of course, he'll definitely include the" donate "button at the bottom of the fundraiser.
Listen to Chalian's Impeachment Watch podcast Thursday with CNN Legal Analyst Eli Honig and White House correspondent Abbey Philip.

Why did the Democrats change the strategy and hold this vote?

Chris Chilitsa has us This explains why the Democrats went from not voting until Thursday's historic move. It comes down to two words: public opinion.

He writes: "What has become clear over the last 10 days or more is that the current approach to investigating an investigation can jeopardize the growing public support for impeachment. "

White House official says to avoid Julian

Tim Morrison, Russia's and Europe's chief advisor to the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators that he was was advised by White House official Fiona Hill to stay away from Ukraine's parallel policy pursued by Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, according to a source familiar with his testimony Thursday

More from Morrison's testimony [19659004]

  • He largely confirmed the testimony and Bill Taylor, the diplomat who was concerned about the pressure on Ukraine.
  • He himself did not see anything wrong with Trump's July 25 conversation with the President of Ukraine.
  • He was involved in divergent reflections on how to handle it.
Keep track of all testimony

Double court day

There were two court hearings Thursday on whether courts could compel witnesses close to Trump to testify in the impiem investigation of the Chamber.

Disbelief in Hearing 1

The first refers to former White House lawyer Don McGon, whom the White House says has been immune from the need to testify.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed his disbelief that the White House could control what its former officials might say when called upon by the House or otherwise.

Deadline for Hearing 2

The second concerns Charles Kopperman, a former deputy national security adviser.

Kuperman's case asks the courts whether he should comply with a subpoena or the White House for immunity.

As the arguments continued in the courtroom at the Federal Court of Justice in Washington over McGon, a lawyer for the Chamber stated that the Kupperman case "served no purpose other than to try to delay."

The judge appointed a hearing in the Kupperman case. on December 10, preparing the main issues to be resolved by January.

Also Thursday

After hearing criticism that he wasn't paying enough attention to Trump's defenders in the House, the White House would increase its reach to Senate Republicans – the process would be next if the House voted to impeach the president. A handful of PP senators were invited to meet Trump hours after the vote on Parliament's resolution.

What are we doing here?

The president has invited foreign powers to interfere in the US presidential election. [19659003] Democrats want to impress him on this.

This is a crossroad for the American system of government as the president tries to change what is acceptable to American politicians. This newsletter will focus on this next moment in US history.

Source link