Texas Rep. Representative John Ratcliff, who aggressively interrogated former special attorney Robert Mueller last week at congressional hearings including his report on Russian intervention in the presidential election in 2016, will be nominated by the president in place of the Coats.
"I would like to thank Dan for his great service in our country," Trump says. "The former director will be appointed soon."
The former senator became the Director of National Intelligence at a difficult time – a president who repeatedly clarified his dislike and distrust of the intelligence services – and spent his administration in the administration in contradiction with Trump, helping a constellation of a dozen agencies that the president publicly mocked, ignored and dismissed. The unsettling dynamics created one of the more unusual spectacles of Trump's presidency and raised questions about his motives, in particular, as they relate to investigations into possible clashes between Moscow and members of his presidential campaign in 201
In May, General Prosecutor William Bar was convicted of reviewing a political accusation by the Ministry of Justice about how the investigation into Russia began and the role of the intelligence community in the process.
At that time, Coats said Bar would receive "all relevant information" to review intelligence data on Russia's election attacks, but he also warned the Prosecutor General not to be too public with what he was deciding.
"I am confident that the Prosecutor General will work with the IC in accordance with long-established standards for the protection of highly sensitive classified information that, if publicly disclosed, would jeopardize our national security," said Coats in a statement. ] Trump's apparent hostility and Trump's mistrust over his own intelligence agencies have made Coates' work as a director, perhaps one of the most politically troubled in Washington.
Coats, a former ambassador and Republican senator from Indiana, praised his professional expertise, entered the work of the leading US spy agencies, and served as Chief Adviser to the President's Intelligence in March 2017.
Vice President Mike Pens is one of Coats's closest allies since the two men share a long history dating back to their time in Congress
But Trump and Coats have never built up close relationships and the president has time and again expressed dissatisfaction with the Coats by telling councilors that he considers Coats in line with other senior officials who have sought to curb it, such as former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former White House chief of staff John Kelly.
And in less than a year Trump's trusts suggested that a coat could be fired.
While Trump complained about a coat in the past, White House officials began seriously throwing themselves away after the holiday weekend on Trump's Day, which Trump spent in relaxing friends and coworkers, two senior officials from the administration announced to CNN.
Trump was still preparing for statements Coat and other officials did three weeks earlier when they presented an annual report to the Congress on World Threats. Coats outlined the intelligence community's assessments, underlining President's claims on issues ranging from Iran to Russia, climate change and the status of ISIS.
Trump looks most annoyed by North Korea's Coates rating. Despite the president's statement that North Korea's leader Kim Chen Un is going to drop out of his nuclear weapons, Coats and other officials said they think Kim would never do it.
In the days preceding the dismissal of Coats, his supporters and the surrogates of the president were reaching out to the media in an attempt to solve the problem. The Coats allies worked in defense of the former senator, while the President's friends tried to raise doubts about the Coats and set the stage for Trump's move.
Chris Rudy, Trump's longtime confidant, told Christian Amanpur on CNN on February 18 that he "heard from sources around the White House that there was simply a general disappointment with the director, with director Coats. There is a sense that there may be a change of leadership in this position. "
Speaking at the second meeting between Trump and Kim scheduled for the end of February, Rudy said," I think it is generally deeply concerned that on the eve of North Korea (at the summit) the National Intelligence Open Hearings will undermine your position. "
Former Coats colleagues stood up in his defense and questioned Trump's ability to cope with information that did not confirm his worldview."
As rumors were heard that a coat could be thrown out, Senator Angus King, independent of Maine, said on 19 February John Berman of CNN that "if Dan Coates is actually pushed – which I deeply hope is not," because he is a great civil servant, but if so – the message is do not give me the facts. "
Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine "DNI Coats is a good friend, a former colleague in the Senate and a leader of integrity, who has always served our country well, and we have the pleasure of having a person of his abilities and honestly leading our intelligence community."
Eventually Trump quickly dealt with the contention and continued with Coats, who remained in his role.
But the president appeared to revive the talks about eventual removal of Coates in July, raising the idea of confidants and rebuilding old frustrations for the chief of intelligence.
A senior White House official confirmed at the time that there had been some discussion about Coats leaving his position as he had been in work for more than two years and was again seeking retirement.
The Life in Politics 
76-year-old coats served in the military before joining the law faculty. He joined the House of Representatives in 1981 and then moved to the Senate before being appointed US Ambassador to Germany in 2001 during President Bush's first term of office. In 2011, Coates returned to the Senate where he served in the intelligence and armed services and withdrew in 2017.
Before being elected, Trump was asked in an interview for August 2016 with Fox News whether he was trust intelligence. "Not so much of the people who do it for our country," Trump said. "See what happened in the past 10 years, and see what happened over the years, it was catastrophic."
He went on, saying, "Actually, I will not use some of the people who are your standard, you know … I will not use them because they made so bad decisions."
Trump's answer showed misunderstanding how intelligence agencies work. They do not make decisions or craft policies, but simply offer their assessments of situations so that political leaders can make the best informed decisions. This interruption will continue to play publicly in the coming months.
In December 2016, after the CIA announced it believed that Russia had intervened directly in the election, hoping to put Trump in the White House, the president did not release it, but instead attacked the CIA, saying that "These are the same people who say that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction." In January 2017, Trump compared intelligence agencies with the Nazis after the news that they had informed him of potential Russian attempts to blackmail him .
In March of that year, Trump asked Coats and Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency, to publicly oppose the investigation of the then FBI Director James Comy for possible coordination between Moscow and his campaign president. Coats and Rodgers were unpleasant about the nature of the President's request and refused to comply, sources told the CNN.
In July 2018, perhaps the most public rift with the Coats and the intelligence community, Trump stood by Russian President Vladimir Putin and publicly said he doubted in the US spies' assessment that Russia has attempted to intervene in the election, saying Putin resolutely denies it.
The coat then came out with a statement reiterating the conclusion that Moscow really did work to change the election results. Shortly thereafter, while on the scene of a conference, the intelligence director was visibly surprised by the announcement that Trump planned to invite Putin to Washington.
"That's going to be special," Coats said, later apologizing, saying he had no intention of disrespect.
Hearing threats for January around the world, mandated annually by Congress, seems to be a turning point. Officials, under oath, must be truthful about issues that are not classified and can be discussed in an open environment. Their answers explained the tremendous gap between the intelligence community's assessments and the President's claims on any number of issues related to national security.
Trump knocked down Coats and other leaders the next day in a series of tweets, while his allies said intelligence officers should not make public judgments that differ from those of the president.
"The Intelligence Committee has to give its officials Trump reserves on ISIS policy, North Korea, Iran, etc. But when intelligence agencies do this publicly, they undermine the administration," Fred Fletz, a former Head of Staff of the National Security Council.
Coats and CIA Director Jina Haspel witnessed that Iran is continuing to observe the international nuclear treaty that Trump decided to abandon in May 2018, suggesting to the president that they are "extremely passive and naive when it comes a question of the dangers of Iran. "
While Trump insisted that the US had won against ISIS in Syria and would therefore withdraw troops from the country, Coats told Congress that" ISIS intends to resume and still commands thousands of fighters in Iraq and Syria. "
Coates and his colleagues also had an impact climate change that the president rejects, and highlighted the threat of Russian attempts to undermine US elections and democracy, a position the president has undermined. or against.
This story has been updated. Kevin Lippak, Sarah Westwood, Jim Suttho, Evan Perez, Steven Collinson, Ted Barrett, Dana Bash, Jeremy Diamond and Joe Ruys contributed to this report.