The President's Twitter barrage over a global threat matrix produced by US intelligence agencies that contradicts his idiosyncratic worldview is hardly surprising given his past behavior. His habit of fashioning a truth that fits his personal prejudices and goals over an objective version of reality has been an undercurrent to his political career.
But when this often-successful political method is carried into the realm of national security, it can be profoundly destructive
"Recently he seems to have his political position, things he wants to achieve as political goals, far above "said Carrie Cordero, a former counselor to the assistant general attorney general for national security, on CNN on Wednesday
Trump's shot at the clandestine community even has some Republicans, who are often loath to criticize the President, worried.
"I would prefer the President to stay out of Twitter, especially with regard to these important national security issues where you have people who are experts and have the background and are professionals," said Sen John Thune, and South Dakota Republican.
"I think in those cases when it comes to their judgment, take into account what they're saying."
Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr declined to critique Trump's
"I have the ultimate faith in the intelligence community," the North Carolina Republican said.
Trump's rejection of intelligence agency ratings that Russia interfered in the 201
His claim to have ended the North Korean nuclear threat with his photo op summit with Kim Jong Un defies CIA reporting , as his assertion that ISIS is beaten "badly," which he has used to justify his snap demand last month for a troop withdrawal from Syria – which also played in Moscow's hands
Now Trump is inventing his own version of "The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passionate and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran", Trump tweeted
Why dissing American spies matters
It is unprecedented for a president to be so often and publicly at war with the intelligence community. The hostilities play directly to the advantage of foreign intelligence services in places like Russia, China and Iran
They create confusion among America's allies over US foreign policy.
Trump's Twitter blast at Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel on Wednesday was a feature (19659002) But it was also another example of how President prioritises his own political goals when they are in conflict with the judgments of the intelligence community. Trashing the Iran deal was a key part of his 2016 campaign platform, and he had more to gain politically by following on his promise than reassessing based on the findings of US experts
No one can work out why Trump is so solicitous of Putin. Perhaps Robert Mueller's special counseling report will shed light on Trump's mysterious past relationship with a nation that US intelligence officials say sought to help his 2016 campaign
But his friendship with Putin requires him to continually cast doubt on the intelligence community's belief that there
No longer the adults in the room
Trump's trolling of US spy agencies and attempts to confuse the true story of what happened in the election provide a constant dividend for Moscow's attempt to sow chaos in the US political system
But the tactic is not just helpful to Trump because it helps move his own personal policy l agenda. With his 2016 campaign and a two-year target of an investigation led by the FBI and then handed to Mueller, Trump likes to validate his outsider's political crusade by claiming he is a victim of a sinister "deep state" warfare centered in the intelligence community.
It is ironic that a Republican President should adopt positions so at odds with his party's self-image as the adult in the Trump base and reaffirms his image as a crusader against the elite Washington establishment.  GOP discomfort with his populist, nationalist attitude on foreign policy has become more and more evident in recent days
The Kentucky Republican's effort stands as a direct rebuke of Trump's plans to withdraw troops from Syria and develop the strategy of halving the US garrison in Afghanistan.
"It would recognize the dangers of a precipitous withdrawal from either conflict and highlight the need for diplomatic engagement and d political solutions to the underlying conflicts in Syria and Afghanistan, McConnell said Tuesday.
McConnell has been positioning himself as the voice of the traditionally hawkish Republican consensus on foreign policy. Though it could be argued that on the idea of bringing troops home from long foreign wars, the president is more in tune with grass-roots opinion than his critics – a view backed by early exchanges in the Democratic White House race [19659020
A large number of Republican House, a member of the Senate Chief Justice Chuck Grassley of Iowa, has signed a bill that would require the release of a summary of Mueller's final report to Congress and the public. members – apart from a clutch of die-hard Trump supporters – backed and overwhelmingly passed by the new Democratic-led House that put a record strong support for NATO – which has been constantly undermined by the President
But The Republican rebellion goes only so far and is usually confined to national security, an area where GOP lawmakers can differ with the President without exacerbating a personal price among base voters that is too painful
And it was n The McDonald's McConnell has not been able to take any measure on the floor that would have undermined Trump's position.