Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Science https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Fact-checking: Gohmert’s attempts to link lunar orbits and solar flares to climate change

Fact-checking: Gohmert’s attempts to link lunar orbits and solar flares to climate change

During the hearing of the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Homert outlined the connection between the Moon and Earth’s orbit and solar flares with climate change. Asking Jennifer Eberlien, deputy chief of the U.S. Forest Service, Homert asked if the National Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management could change the orbits of the moon and earth, making a comment that some see as an attempt to argue that climate change it must be seen as a natural phenomenon rather than a man-made one.

“I was informed by the director of NASA that they found that the moon’s orbit was changing slightly, as was the Earth̵

7;s orbit around the sun,” Homert said.

“We know that there has been significant activity in solar flares. So, is there anything the National Forest Service or the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) can do to change the course of the lunar orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the Sun? “Obviously, this will have profound consequences for our climate,” Congressman Eberlien asked.

Eberlien replied that “he will have to contact you on this matter, Mr. Homert.”

Facts first: Homer’s remark makes no sense. The suggestion that solar flares and orbital activity cause or contribute significantly to the climate change observed today is completely incorrect. Greenhouse gases produced by humans are the main driver of rapid global warming.

Homert’s office did not respond to CNN’s requests for clarification of his remarks, which were widely mocked on Twitter.
Brian Bretschneider, a climate scientist and professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, wrote briefly, “We can’t change the orbit of the Earth or the Moon. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.”
“The ‘scientific-sounding’ reasons most politicians use to reject climate change are not primarily due to a lack of education or knowledge,” Catherine Hayhou, a climate scientist and co-director of the Texas Climate Center, wrote on Twitter. Technical University. “No: they are deliberately produced and offered as a pleasant excuse to hide the real problem: disgust at the solution. They don’t want to fix it.”

Everything Homer claims is debunked by NASA.

In an article written by NASA, the agency noted – citing the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – that “the scientific consensus is that long-term and short-term variations in solar activity play only a very small role in the Earth’s climate.”

The article also notes that the warming driven by man-made greenhouse gases is “50 times greater than the slight additional warming coming from the Sun itself for the same amount of time.”

The idea that changing the orbits of the Earth and the Moon is also a major factor in climate change is wrong.

As NASA notes in an article on Earth’s orbital cycles, cycles “cannot account for the current period of rapid warming.”

These cycles occur over tens to hundreds of thousands of years. NASA, meanwhile, says: “Scientists are convinced that the recent warming of the Earth is mainly due to human activities – in particular the direct introduction of carbon dioxide into the Earth’s atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels.”

Ryan Nobles and CNN’s Brandon Miller contributed to this article.

Source link