Here are five things we learned during the game:
1) This is what it is to watch Patrick Mahomes play against you
Aaron Rodgers completely dismantled the Chiefs defense when the two teams met at Lambo Field in 2015. But since these teams are so rare in the regular season, it's easy to forget how good Rogers is.
To the last detail below, the first two Packers packages were exactly what we used to see from Mahomes: escaping the pressure of completing laser gaps, recognizing (and benefiting from) free games, creating (and taking advantage of) ) downfield inconsistencies for big plays and get rid of the penalties that go against you. And it didn't stop there: Under heavy pressure in the fourth quarter, Rodgers seemed to be throwing the ball – and instead ended up with an incredible pass to Jamaal Williams.
We're not kidding. The fitting comparison for Mahomes is not Brett Faver – as many people suggested when drafting Mahomes in 2017. Instead, it's Rodgers, who
is now still playing at an elite level during his 15th season on NFL.
Everything else is true about this game – and this season – there is one thing we can be thankful for: Patrick Mahomes belongs to Kansas City Leaders … for a long time.
2) Matt Moore is the hero
The eventual outcome of the game really doesn't matter; Moore was playing money from home. Just ten days ago, against the Denver Broncos, he set another of those NFL senior records becoming the second-oldest player to throw 1,000 passes in the NFL. Any performance that did not cause total and utter embarrassment for himself or the team would be a victory for the 35-year-old quarterback, who head coach Andy Reid left after retiring in August.
For decades onwards, writers like myself are unlikely to dig through this article by researching the game that reinforced the career of Hall of Fame defender Matt Moore. But for a brief, glittering moment on a crisp autumn night in Kansas City, Moore showed that dreams – sometimes even those already abandoned – can still come true.
Even if it's just for a game or two.  Was Moore perfect? No. He was slowly starting. He missed a few throws he would like to have back. But after a year out of the game and only a week practicing with the first string, he played with passion and energy, kicking with one of the best quarterbacks to ever play. He did the job: put the team in a position where they could win the game – one in which almost no one expected the Chiefs to prevail. If there was a fumble that had nothing to do with it – or maybe a few other jumps that went the wrong way – the team could easily pull it off.
It is difficult to imagine how we could expect more from a man.
3) Chiefs Defense Improves
After the unsuccessful performances we've seen from the Chiefs' defense over the last few years – and the first six weeks out of the season – I can't blame anyone who wasn't ready to credit the blockbuster performance against the Broncos for everything else but not fake for a bad offense. And let (again) be clear: two games don't make a season more than a single game against Denver.
Well … maybe a little a little more.
But no one will say that the Packers offense is bad or will be able to claim that Rogers had a terrible night against the Chiefs. The protection of the bosses is not great. Anyone can see this. But this is improving . When a team returns to full strength – or at least as close to full strength as an NFL team can manage these days – the defense can be effective enough to make the team a serious, legitimate contender for the NFL.  That was the goal, wasn't it? To improve defense enough not to be held accountable in late and postseason games? This objective has not yet been achieved. But this is evident.
4) That's why they play the games
How fast we forgot: The Chiefs had a very good crime before Patrick Mahomes to come to Kansas City. Certainly Mahomes takes it to another level, but it's a mistake to think that any game that Mahomes cannot play automatically enters the loss column. It was not true before the arrival of Mahomes – and it is not true now.
This does not mean that the game could not have had a different result if Mahomes had been available to play. It's just a reminder that while the quarterback is by far the most influential player on today's NFL roster, he is still not the only player on the roster . Even with Mahomes on the sidelines, the superiors approached a great deal to pull out what would have been trumpeted as a stunning upset victory – though it probably wouldn't have been as stunning as most would have done.
5) Performance is always pivotal with 5:13 remaining in the game. Many will characterize this as the reason bosses lose the game.
I will not say that is not so. There is a solid argument that this is a wrong decision.
But I will agree with what a tight end Travis Kielce said about this after the match: that the real failure was in the third and third game that immediately preceded. then. Kels could catch him – and he had to. If there were, the Chiefs were well positioned to get off the field and score, leaving the Packers very little time to respond; they effectively mix pass and run, move the ball down the field and take time out of the clock. It just didn't happen.
The same can be said of LeSean McCoy's layup at the Chiefs' 25-yard line at the end of the third quarter. The Packers were passing in this delusion to break – that was ultimately the difference in the game. As is almost always the case in games between well-matched NFL teams, turnovers are critical. On Sunday night, the Chiefs had one, while the Packers didn't have one. It's not just a coincidence that the Packers won the game.
There were other such moments.
So it's not that Reid's decision has no effect. It happened. But as often happens, discussion of such a solution masks the real problem: the team simply did not perform at critical moments.