قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ George F. Will: To defeat Trump, Democrats have to practice a policy of modesty

George F. Will: To defeat Trump, Democrats have to practice a policy of modesty



Washington: "This is a great advantage for a president," said the 30th, "and is a major source of safety for the country to know he is not a great person." Or, Calvin Coolidge would say a great woman today.

While today's president is being advertised as "an extremely stable genius" and those who would replace it promise a national transformation, attention should be paid to the detailed details of presidential policy, which suggests that modesty policy can lead to changes in voting where they are important, and at least 270 voters for a Democrat.

If the near future resembles the immediate past that is often the case, the Democratic Party candidate in 2020 will be, as the Republican candidate was in 201

6, the party preferred by the party faction for which the government is – more practical than ideological. For Republicans in 2016, the faction – a non-college white – felt like a victim of economic dynamics that most benefited from the people who least admired this faction. In 2020, the decisive democratic faction in the nomination competition could be, as in 2016, African Americans, whose assessment of the government is particularly practical: what about health, employment, schools? For them, the packing of the Supreme Court, the abolition of the presidential post, the abolition of the Electoral College and other promises of gestures are probably distracting. African-Americans were at least 20% of the votes in 15 of the primary elections in 2016 and in all primary elections. together they gave 76% of their votes to Hillary Clinton. That's why Trump did not get the chance to defeat Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who narrowly beat Clinton among the white voters in the primary election. These figures are from Josh Kraushaar of the National Journal, which refers to a Pew study for 2016, which found that only 27% of African-American democrats were considered liberal, and the multitude considered to be moderate. Some of these multitudes certainly object to the idea of ​​slavery repairs as a sign of irreparable harm. And the importance of securing a stable African-American turnout for Democrats is illustrated by this fact: if in 2004 John Kerry received so many black voices in Ohio, as Barack Obama had to get in 2008, Kerry would have been 44 President.

In addition, during the 110-day sprint between the end of the Milwaukee Democratic Nomination Convention and Election Day, the earliest vote, which is subject to change, began on 18 September in Minnesota and at least one-fifth of voters in 2020, they will probably roll their ballots before the day of the election. Decisive voters can be those who do not want transformation, but restoration – restoration of national government, which is neither disturbing nor exhausting. So the Democratic Party, the oldest party in the world to win the popular vote in six of the seven presidential elections for the first time, has to focus on pulling Donald Trump's list of countries in 2016 and to do so carrying more than 487 counties (3142) Clinton did. Democrats could try to decipher the nearly 41-point cradle in the impenetrable Howard County in northeastern Iowa, the only US state to vote for Obama over Mitt Romney (by 20.9 points) in 2012, and four years later in Trumps over Clinton Democrats must withdraw from 402 other districts who voted for Trump after having voted for Obama at least once. This will require Democrats' progressive lions to place a moderate lamb on the Democrats as biblical, as it is unpleasant to the progressive pride of their awakening. But they could be encouraged to be more political ecumenical, remembering this: In 2016, Clinton won a million more votes than Obama in 2012 in New York, Massachusetts and California, but won a million than it did anywhere else.

But it all depends on the rejection of Democrats before allowing them to influence their choice of candidate, their self-explanatory explanation for 2016. As William Vogelli, editor-in-chief of Claremont Review of Books, wrote: The 2016 Elections the fanaticism of your opponents clearly shows that the problem is not that the Democrats did not do enough to deserve the people's votes, but that people are not good enough to deserve the Democrats' rule. Rather than later, even Democrats will begin to suspect that denigrating people while they vote for you has no strategic plausibility. "

  George F. Will The Washington Post </p>
</div>
<div class=
  George F. Will The Washington Post </p>
</div>
<div class=
  George F. Will The Washington Post </p>
</div>
<div class=
  George F. Will Will </b> <i>  wrote a column twice a week on politics, interior and foreign affairs, began his column with the Washington Post in 1974, and received the Pulitzer Prize for comment in 1977. His last book, Conservative Sensitivity, , was issued in June 2019. </i></p><div><script async src=


Source link