قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Greg Jarrett: The stone indictment does not show any evidence of a "secret agreement" of Trump-Russia.

Greg Jarrett: The stone indictment does not show any evidence of a "secret agreement" of Trump-Russia.



The accusation of President Trump's former political adviser Roger Stone, who was arrested on Friday on charges of servicing, faking allegations and forging witnesses, shows once again that there is no evidence of a collusion between Trump and Russia.

Special Adviser Robert Muller investigates the charges in May 2017 that Donald Trump or the people in his presidential campaign may have worked with Russia to win the elections in 2016. There is no doubt that if Muller believed there was proof of such an activity, the special lawyer would have imposed on Stone some sort of offense related to collusion.

It is important that Stone was not accused of anything related to collusion. In fact, no one has been charged with the alleged crime that Muller has appointed to investigate.

From Stone, Muller chose to do what he did so often ̵

1; to raise charges that were generated by his own investigation. They are commonly referred to as "process crimes". This means that they are crimes against the lawsuit. Such crimes usually happen when someone intervenes in investigative procedures.

Nowhere in Mueller's accusation is it claimed that Stone had negotiated, coordinated or negotiated with Russia to influence the presidential elections in 2016.

This is not to minimize the process, they are serious violations of the law. No one should lie, mislead or interfere with law enforcement investigations.

However, the distinction between a principal offense and a criminal offense is significant. The first is an independent criminal act. The latter is derived from the investigation of whether such an act has ever occurred. "I will plead guilty to these charges," Stone told reporters after the arrest and appearance at the federal court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. "I will win them in court, a politically motivated investigation."

So far, Müller's comprehensive investigation has not provided any evidence and no accusations in support of his original mandate. The Special Attorney has little to show for his efforts, which cost the taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, and has broken the president with unfounded accusations as soon as he takes office.

So far, Müller's comprehensive investigation has not provided any evidence and no accusations in support of his original mandate. The Special Attorney has little to show for his efforts, which cost the taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, and has broken the president with unfounded accusations as soon as he takes office.

The implacable truth is that a wicked plot supposed to have risen between Trump and the Russian President Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin was deceit all the time-it just never happened.

In fact, the campaign of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton paid for unchecked Russian information and then handed it to the FBI and the Justice Department under a scheme that would harm Trump, her political adversary.

The Russian "secret agreement" was nothing more than a clever and unfair invention. The Romanian "secret agreement" is authentic and one of the most dirty tricks in modern American politics.

The FBI became an accomplice to the Trump's scheme in a series of unlawful, if not corrupt, decisions.

First, the Bureau should never begin its initial investigation in July 2016, which later became Muller's probe. He had no reason and no credible evidence to justify the investigation. Secondly, the FBI should never have misused an untested anti-Trump "dossier," made up of a discredited and biased source, to get an order for spying on the Trump campaign foreign policy adviser. In the course of the trial, the FBI and the Ministry of Justice withdrew evidence from an intelligence tribunal and defrauded the judges issuing wiretapping orders.

Finally, a special lawyer should never be appointed. According to federal regulations, there must first be evidence of a crime for the appointment of a special lawyer. There was no such evidence. If it was not for the FBI and the Ministry of Justice, there would never be an investigation that Kaun suspected would hinder, which would mean that an indictment would not be brought against him

. The truth is that the inappropriate existence of Muller's investigation creates the crimes Stone accuses of committing.

The indictment against Stone suggests that he may have had some knowledge or inside information about the Clinton campaign's e-mail content that was released by WikiLeaks in the summer of 2016.

WikiLeaks never said how has received emails. Russian intelligence agents are reportedly responsible for hackers.

Although Stone's efforts to gather details about the emails and surrender them to Trump's campaign is certainly an irritating story, this activity is not a crime. At that time, hundreds of journalists – including myself – contacted sources or were trying to get additional information directly from WikiLeaks. None of us has been charged with a crime.

Stone seems to have speculated or predicted that hacking emails would be very damaging to Clinton's campaign. Of course, this is obvious.

The study of Stone's emails shows that it offers little more than the same information that WikiLeaks has already made public. The mistake of Stone, if any, is that he created the appearance that he knew more than in reality.

But millions of people exaggerate their knowledge of all sorts of things every day to look smarter or more important than them. , They are not accused of committing crimes. Unless it can be shown that Stone was somehow involved in the actual hacking of Clinton's emails, he did not violate any felony crime laws. That is why he is not charged with a conspiracy. Five of the accusations against Stone are about making false statements during the investigation of Muller. They will be extremely difficult to prove to a special lawyer. The statute governing these crimes (18 U.S.C. 1001) requires proof that false claims are made "deliberately and deliberately".

Damaged memory or reduced memory is not enough to withstand the specific requirement of deliberate accusation. If Stone remembers events differently than Muller interprets them, it is not a crime.

In addition, Stone changed some of his testimony with corrected statements. This will be presented as evidence in his defense

Allegations of forging witnesses and obstructing the investigation may be more problematic for Stone. Many things will depend on the facts as they are developed

So far, the indictment of Mueller for Stone has to be read through a skeptical lens. Prosecutors present only their own sloping versions of the events. During the trial, Stone's attorneys will present their evidence and arguments. Like all accused, Stone must be considered innocent if prosecutors do not prove it guilty.

Unfortunately, the "accusations" of Muller against Stone and others in Trump's orbit represent a selective and uneven persecution as compared to their attitude towards Clinton's allies. 19659003] Neither Clinton's superiors nor Huma Abedin nor Cheryl Mills were accused of falsely reporting to the FBI during their 2016 interviews about the Clinton email scandal in which Clinton misused the private email server instead of providing the State Department's secure e-mail when Abidey and Mills insisted they knew nothing about Clinton's personal server until she left the State Department.

Former FBI Director James Howie said the persecutions of Abedin and Mills were not justified, dismissing the Commission of the Judiciary, "There are always contradictory memories of facts."

the same person who distorted the facts and broke the law to clear Clinton from the statutes that she so cruelly broke. He misinterpreted the law in a way that could only be deliberate. Then he had the weapons of the law to investigate Trump without legal justification or credible evidence.

The same double standard of justice is now applied by longtime friend and ally of Howie Robert Muller.

President Trump's enemies are desperate to find something – something – in the investigation of Muller that points to Trump's abuses because they want the president to be removed from power and forced to leave office. So far, nothing that has become public is not "smoking with weapons" that they imagine can show that Trump has been involved in any criminal activity
Source link