قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Greg Jarrett: The Trump Signaler May Be No Intruder

Greg Jarrett: The Trump Signaler May Be No Intruder



The latest media hysteria in the media over the offender's complaint that "according to FoxNews.com" he reports that President Trump has made a disturbing and unspecified "promise" to a foreign leader, is based on valuable little information. This has not stopped journalists from condemning Trump in the court of public opinion and predicting his impending death.

Who exactly is this unidentified "abuser"? What is the specific nature of his "urgent concern" complaint against the President? Is this complaint in compliance with the Intelligence Reporting Intelligence Act (ICWPA)? These are just a few of the most fundamental questions that remain largely unknown.

COMPLAINT OF PARTICLE REPORTED FOR COMMERCIAL "PROMISE" TO INTEGRATED LEADER, EXCLUDE FROM DC FIRESTORM

Despite the insignificance of the facts, some reasonable remarks and conclusions9 would have been spying on our own president. The complaint suggests that this scout was listening to Trump's conversation with a foreign leader. Was this person officially asked to listen to the conversation or did he or she secretly listen? We don't know.

  • This agent, who is an elected and lower federal official in the government hierarchy, clearly believes that it is his job to guess the motivation behind the words of the elected president, who is the highest ranking officer in the US government.
  • Article II of the Constitution gives the President broad authority to conduct foreign affairs, to negotiate with leaders of other countries, to make demands or to make promises. The Constitution does not authorize the review, approval or disapproval of spies or other elected officials in the executive branch.
  • ICWPA law defines the parameters of an "urgent concern" complaint as an abuse or violation of the law "in connection with the financing, administration or intelligence operations, which includes classified information but does not include differences of opinion on public policy issues. "The president's conversation with a foreign leader does not seem to fall within this definition of signalers.
  • The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) seems to agree with this assessment. The agency's attorney general wrote to him saying that the complaint did not meet ICWPA's definition because it involved behavior "from outside the information community and not related to intelligence," according to a Fox News report. Therefore, the DNI refused to submit the complaint to Congress.
  • Click here to get the application of FOX NEWS

    To put it in an understandable language, a spy who claims to have spied on the president has no legal complaint against that president under the law. ICWPA is a mechanism for reporting alleged abuses to members of the intelligence community of which the president is not. Yes, in the end, the alphabet soup of intelligence agencies reports to the president, but that does not make Trump a member of that community, and is not subject to its rules of conduct.

    Click here to receive newsletter [1

    ] 19659004] So it turns out that the "whistle" may not be an intruder at all. But you won't hear it from the mass media. They are too busy lighting their own hair on fire.

    Click here to read more from GREGG JARRETT


    Source link