College professor who New York Times colonist Brett Stevens targeted for a grudging tweet fired at a rally Tuesday night, accusing his email of "abuse of power."
"Brett Stevens is He Knows It. I Know This. He won the Pulitzer Prize and has a regular New York Times editorial column. I'm just some professor … So, I was surprised I got an email from Brett Stevens last night, "George Washington University Assistant Professor Dave Karpf began his piece published in Esquire.
Carpf was having fun at Stevens' expense on Monday, when he suggested that the bed bugs that reportedly attacked the Times last weekend were a "metaphor" and that "bed bugs were Brett Stephens," something Stephens took personal enough to send both the email and GWU's provocation.
NYT COLUMNIST BRET STEPHENS BRUTALLY CONTAINS RESPONSIBILITY TO "BEDBUG" TWITTER JAB [1
" This means that he failed in a serious attempt to promote online civic discourse. This means that he tried to send a message that he was standing above me in the status hierarchy and that people like me should not write malicious jokes about people like him online. It was an exercise in power – the use of the imprimatur of The New York Times to abandon a speech he found unpleasant. "
The Associate Professor tapped Stevens' appearance on MSNBC, where he suggested that he was called" bedbug "a tactic that followed" totalitarian regimes. "
"You can draw your own conclusion whether my joke was worth the crap. But equating a random Twitter account with totalitarian mode is a remarkably long walk," Karpf responds.
He went on to suggest that Stevens was a hypocrite because he repeatedly denied "safe spaces" and wrote a headline, "Free Speech and the Need for Discomfort," which Karpf added "Discomfort for you but not for me. , looks … "
Click here to get the application of FOX NEWS
" Brett Stevens seems to think that his social status should make him immune to criticism from people like me. I think the rewards of his social status come with the understanding that lesser-known people will say they mean things to him online, ”Carpf continued. Stevens reached out to me for the mistaken belief that I would be ashamed. He reached out, believing that my university would make me provoke the anger of a writer in The New York Times. This is an abuse of his social station. It costs me nothing, but abuse of his power would lead to a real punishment for a younger or less privileged academician. "
" The Times should expect more from its writers. Stevens should expect more from himself. No one has a free speech from a public intellectual with a regular column in the documentation. Stevens is free to say whatever he wants. With this freedom comes the discomfort that people will disagree with. If Stevens is to have this social power, he will have to learn to hold it more responsibly. "