قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Here's what the Green New Course actually says

Here's what the Green New Course actually says

But the proposal, which is about to become a litmus for many Democratic Party rivals in 2020, is not just a decision about what hurts the United States. That would mean bringing American society back to the drawing board and rebuilding it from the safety net. American work to work with family farmers to retrofit each building in the country.

Here is a look at some passages contained in the 14-page resolution and what they could mean for the country:

Renewable Energy

"Meeting 100% of US electricity demand through Clean, Renewable and zero energy

This would be a huge turn in US energy. Renewable energy sources ̵
1; including hydroelectric, wind, biomass, solar and geothermal – currently account for about 20% of US energy production, equivalent to nuclear power, as reported by the US Energy Information Agency. The largest share is natural gas – about 32% – and coal is not lagging behind – 30%. The current forecast is that renewable energies will account for about 31% of US energy production by 2050, with a sharp drop for nuclear and coal.

Intelligent Network

"Building or Upgrading of Energy Efficient, Distributed and" Intelligent "Energy Networks and Work to Provide Affordable Electricity Prices

Improving the country's electrical system is a huge undertaking by Congress fought for over a decade. He provided funds for an intelligent network – a re-designed power grid that uses technology to improve reliability and efficiency – as part of the economic stimulus for 2009, but not since then. Since then, the Department of Energy has provided some funds, according to the Congress Research Service, putting each year $ 3.6 billion to the intelligent network – not enough to implement it nationwide by 2030. It will cost hundreds of billions of dollars over 20 years.

"Modernizing all existing US buildings and building new buildings to achieve maximum energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort and durability, including through electrification"

Without Google, we know that there are a lot of buildings in the US The improvement of all of them will surely lead to a blast of the green building industry Will this be done through tax credits Grants Large building upgrades have been tested before but the 2009 stimulus, which puts $ 4.5 billion to rebuild federal buildings, and $ 3 billion to modernize public housing projects. "Here is a HUD report on public housing efforts, which states that electricity and water savings have been achieved, however, to repeat, there are many buildings in the United States and no one knows what would be worth making "green." [19659906] Transport

" United States to eliminate pollution and emissions and greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector, to the extent technologically feasible, including through investment vehicle with zero emissions infrastructure and production; (ii) clean, accessible and accessible public transport; and (iii) high-speed rail transport

There are models to promote low-emission vehicles that the current government abandons. Some federal tax incentives for people who buy electric vehicles are out (Tesla!) And have not been renewed. Others, such as increased emission standards, are threatened by the Trump administration. Relatively cheap gas in recent years has also not helped Americans achieve better fuel efficiency.

But encouraging people with tax incentives is different from revising transport systems. And it's tough: Just a few days after the introduction of the Green New Deal, the new Governor of California, Gavin Newham, Democrat and Progressive, pulled the planned high-speed rail from Los Angeles to San Francisco instead of focusing on three smaller communities in Central Valley. One of the reasons why Newswoman said he has not completed the program is that he does not want the state to return a federal loan of $ 3.5 billion. Low-tech solutions

"greenhouse gas abatement and pollution reduction, including through restoration of natural ecosystems through proven low-tech solutions that increase carbon storage in the soil, such as conservation and afforestation"

to embrace many things, one of which will essentially plant trees to fight climate change. This is something. It has been tested in Israel and Europe and has made efforts to reforest in Brazil. Namely, the cutting of tropical forests there plays a bigger role in climate change. Carbon Brief has a convenient map of the world. The US Department of Agriculture and the Department of Forests have a complex estimate of the afforestation costs in each county in the United States. Another may be the protection and restoration of wetlands to protect themselves from the effects of climate change. Crops and Climate Change

"working in collaboration with farmers and farmers in the United States to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector as far as technologically feasible"

is now engaged in cow, according to the president, and this premature set of frequently asked questions. Cow and livestock feeds are something that deserves attention. It's not about the cow of your purebred heritage, but about the industrial agriculture.
Beef accounts for 41% of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock and livestock accounts for 14.5% of global emissions, according to a CNN special report this year, which also lists the UN Panel on the report on the change the climate that offers changing diets worldwide would contribute to 20% of the efforts needed to reduce global temperatures. The USDA projects average American will eat about 222.4 pounds of meat and poultry in 2019, of which 53.4 pounds will be beef.

Guaranteed work, leave, rest and retirement

with family salaries, adequate family and medical leave, paid holidays, and pension security for all people in the United States.

Here we are removing the part of the Climate Change document to objectives that seem even more difficult to achieve, Would a family wage mean different pay for people with a different number of children? Does both adults require to work in a household? Living fee in Springfield, Illinois – randomly selected – in the MTI calculator is $ 11.41 per hour for an adult and $ 18.44 for two adults and two children. If one of the adults works part-time, the main hourly wage rises to $ 26.39.
Things change when you put benefits. An interesting report from the left-centered Center for Budget and Political Priorities of 2018, with some estimates of federal job security costs, shows that the government can provide 9.7 million jobs to sub- or low-wage earners. from $ 32,500 to account for different levels of experience, and so on. Adding taxes and benefits makes the annual cost of each job about $ 56,000. So the total government spending will be about $ 543 billion a year.
This is less than nearly $ 674 billion, which the government spends on the budget of the Pentagon. This is much less than the government spends on Medicare and Social Security programs every year.

Labor Law

"Strengthening and Implementation of Labor, Health and Safety at Work, Anti-Discrimination and Pay and Hourly Standards for All Employers, Industries and Sectors"

There are wage laws in the various industries. they work with trucks, as employees in restaurants have a lower minimum wage, some countries have introduced much higher minimum wages for their workers, creating new laws on this front will require a national debate. However, it also has very little to do with climate change

Public property

"providing and using funds so that the public obtains appropriate ownership and return on investments, adequate capital (including through subsidies from community, public banks and other public funding), technical expertise, supportive policies, and other forms of community, organization, federal, state and local government agencies, and companies working on the mobilization of the Green New Treaty "

The public will pay for all this change so the public needs to get a return is one way to look at this passage. The public as an owner is probably enough to strike fear in many Republicans. And that would be a sure trigger for them to bring Venezuela, which has shed the riches of its state oil company.

On the other hand, California is again dealing with a private property bankruptcy, PG & E, and discusses whether it should become a public utility. How governments need to own things is an important issue without a clear answer.

Ensuring Higher Education

"Providing resources, training and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States, focusing on the front line and vulnerable communities so that these communities can be full and equal "

There is a lot in this part, but let's focus on the higher education section for all people. This sounds like the proposals for free colleges in recent years. This may not be something that Democrats will exactly oppose. But this is also not something that has found a way to achieve more. A proposal for a free college, which was not included in the Green New Course, but offered guidance, came from Senator Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont. It will provide countries with $ 47 billion annually to cover two-thirds of the cost of training students at state colleges and universities. Sanders proposed a new Wall Street trade tax to fund the program.

Unions are in long-term decline in the US While 20% of salaries and wages in the United States were in trade unions in 1983 – about 17.7 million, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics – this is up to 10.5% of wage and salary workers and 14.7 million union workers 2018. There are many reasons for this decline, not least the changing nature of US production

Trade unions remain the strongest in the public sector and among government officials, ranging from law enforcement to teachers, with an additional 1.6 million workers in jobs covered by trade union contracts but not union members

Commercial Transactions

"Implementation and Implementation of Trade Rules, Supply Standards and Border Corrections with High Protection of the Workforce and the Environment"

In this case, Green New Dealers can be brought in line with Trump against commercial transactions , as well there is Senator Elizabeth Warren. She, like Trump, opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership. He said it was bad negotiation. She said she did not do enough for the international rights of workers. But the Green New Crowd crowd goes further and opposes even the dealings that Trump supports, similar to the US-Mexican-Canadian trade agreement that Warren called NAFTA 2.0.

"Indigenous peoples

" Obtaining free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples for all decisions affecting indigenous peoples and their traditional territories, compliance with all treaties and agreements with indigenous peoples, and protection and enforcement of sovereignty and the earthly rights of the indigenous population "

I see this playing a role, in particular with regard to oil drilling, in the Arctic Wildlife Reserve or in terms of insulation such as the" Standing Rock "in North Dakota in 2016. This will certainly be a political change for the US government, which sometimes seems to have respected oil companies.

There may be lost opportunities for development, but many democrats will surely trade that they are close targets for slowing dependence on oil and for indigenous peoples.

"providing all people of the United States with – (i) high-quality health care, (ii) affordable, safe and adequate housing, (iii) affordable, safe and adequate housing, ) economic security;) access to clean water, clean air, healthy and affordable food, and nature

This brings together many things.This question between progressive and conservative will be whether the US government should give access to health care.Many of the supporters of the "Green New Course" supported Medicare-for-all, which is both a common idea that many Democrats are lagging behind, as well as a specific political proposal with fewer supporters

One question is whether the government will have to end the private sector healthcare to create a public, and this kind of drastic change has the potential to really frighten voters who punish Democrats for the creation of the Accessibility Care Act in 2010, and then publish Republicans trying to take it in 2018 [19659054] The government is now right and quite, although some say it is not enough for food, water, air and nature fronts with the Food and Drug Administration, the USDA, the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Park Service, so it's hard to say so what will change within a green new course without more details.

Source link