Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ House adopts general election reform bill and police reform measure named after George Floyd

House adopts general election reform bill and police reform measure named after George Floyd



Washington – On Wednesday, the House passed HR 1, a broad bill to reform government and elections and a key legislative priority for the democratic majority. The House also passed the George Floyd Justice Act to the police, although the vote was originally scheduled for Thursday. He was moved up because security threat.

Two sources from the Chamber confirmed to CBS News that there have been discussions about raising the votes in the Chamber because of the threat. The U.S. Capitol Police Department “has received new and relevant information and intelligence showing additional interest in the Capitol for March 4-6 from a police group,”

; a weapons officer said in a newsletter Wednesday.

Acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pitman told lawmakers during a hearing Wednesday that “we have some in terms of intelligence” and “we have improved our security position.” Concerns about the safety of lawmakers come after that The Capitol was stormed by a mob trying to cancel the January 6 presidential election, with several rebels trying to harm or even kill MPs.

Majority majority leader Stenny Hoyer has released an updated schedule showing that the House will vote on George Floyd’s measure on Wednesday night instead of Thursday, allowing the House to end its working week a day earlier and not attend Thursday’s meeting.

HR 1, adopted by vote 220-210. No Republican voted to pass the bill, which is not surprising, as most Republicans voted against it, saying they believed it was a federal overrun and a seizure of democratic power.

“This is something that is extremely popular among the American people. The American people want to reduce the role of big, dark money with special interest rates in politics, which hinders so many good things. People want to see an end to voter repression,” the speaker said. Nancy Pelosi told HR 1 on Tuesday.

By a vote of 220 to 212, the House also voted to pass the George Floyd Police Justice Act, named after the Minnesota man who died at the police station last year after an officer knelt on his neck for a few minutes, inciting a a wave of protests against racial violence and police brutality in the summer. Democrats Jared Golden of Maine and Ron Kind of Wisconsin voted against the law. Republican Lance Gooden of Texas voted for the bill, but later tweeted that he did it by mistake.

The legislation would prohibit detention and redesign qualified immunity protection for law enforcement agencies. A bill to reform the police was proposed by Republican Sen. Tim Scott in the Senate last year, although it was blocked by Democrats, who said it did not go far enough. Although the two bills have many similarities, they differ in terms of qualified protection of immunity for law enforcement officers.

After the vote in the House, civil rights lawyer Benjamin Crump wrote on Twitter: “On behalf of George Floyd’s family, we are deeply grateful and grateful for the leadership of the US House of Commons. “

The House had already passed HR 1 in 2019 after Democrats took the majority and passed the Police Justice Act last spring, but no bill was considered in the Republican-controlled Senate. Democrats currently have a narrow 50-seat majority in the Senate, but most legislation requires 60 votes in advance. The bills are unlikely to get support from ten Republican senators, so theirs the prospects for moving to the Senate are bleak.

HR 1, known as the People Act, will revise government ethics and campaign finance laws and seek to strengthen voting rights by creating automatic voter registration and expanding access to early voting and absenteeism. The bill comes as Republican-controlled state legislatures across the country seek to restrict voting rights, including measures to restrict postal voting and impose stricter requirements for voter identification.

“We believe that HR 1 must pass because Republican lawmakers, concerned about their losses, neither in their own states nor in the country, are stepping up their efforts again to make it difficult for people to vote,” said Parliamentary Majority Leader Steni. Hoyer told reporters on Tuesday.

The Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority of 6 to 3, is also given two Arizona laws which restrict access to voting, which Democrats say disproportionately affects minority voters. If the court upholds these laws, it could allow lawmakers to impose even more restrictive voting laws and a higher standard for parties who want to challenge them.

Progressives say the Senate must remove the filibuster, which will allow legislation to advance by a simple majority to pass on its key priorities. Some Democrats argue that it is important to remove the filibuster, especially in order to pass legislation on voting rights, such as the Human Rights Act and the John Lewis Voting Act, which will restore the provisions of the Voting Rights Act from 1965, rejected by the Supreme Court. Former President Barack Obama called for the removal of the filibuster so that voting rights laws could pass through the Senate during his praise of Louis’s funeral last summer.

Democratic Sen. Rafael Warnock has suggested that there may be a limited exception to the rules of the bill on bills related to voting and civil rights. Warnock was elected to represent Georgia in a special election in January, and the Republican-controlled legislature recently introduced bills to make it easier to vote early and vote by mail.

“Voting rights are the preservation of all other rights, and we must do everything we can to preserve the votes of the people in our democracy,” Warnock told reporters on Tuesday. “I think the problems are urgent enough to leave all the options on the table.”

However, Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kirsten Cinema voiced opposition to the removal of the filibuster. Manchin said Monday that he would “never” change his decision to terminate the filibuster.

“Never! Jesus Christ! What do you never understand?” said Manchin.

Nicole Killion and Brian Dax contributed to this report.




Source link