قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ If We All Ate Enough Fruits And Vegetables, There Will Be Big Shortages: The Salt: NPR

If We All Ate Enough Fruits And Vegetables, There Will Be Big Shortages: The Salt: NPR



 Researchers project that by 2050, estimated that 1.5 billion more people will live in places with poor supply of fruits and vegetables to meet their daily intake recommendations - unless challenges such as food waste and improved productivity are solved

Wanwisa Hernandez / EyeEm / Getty Images
        
    

 Researchers project that by 2050, estimated that 1.5 billion more people will live in places with poor supply of fruits and vegetables to meet their daily intake recommendations - unless challenges such as food waste and improved productivity are solved

Wanwisa Hernandez / EyeEm / Getty Images
            
        

If everyone around the globe started eating the recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables, it would not be enough to go around. This is the conclusion of a new study published in The Lancet Planetary Health.

Currently, only about 55% of people around the globe live in countries with adequate availability of fruits and vegetables – enough to meet the minimum target of 400 grams per person per day for the World Health Organization.

With economic growth, presumably, production will expand. But researchers believe that by 2050, an estimated 1.5 billion more people will live in places with poor supply – unless challenges such as food waste and improved productivity are solved

The report comes at a time when poor diets are a leading cause of premature death. In fact, recent study founddiets are now responsible for more deaths than smoking around the globe. And it's becoming increasingly clear that current dietary patterns are detrimental to the environment, too. Recent studies, including the EAT-Lancet study and the Global Nutrition Report, have highlighted the need for a radical shift in the food system aimed at nudging people towards more nutritious and sustainable diets

"Current diets are detrimental to both human and planetary health and shifting toward more balanced, predominantly plant-based diets is seen as crucial to improving both ", writes the authors of the new Lancet Planetary Health study.

Currently, the global supply of calories is more than enough to meet consumption. But many people eat low-quality diets "characterized by cheap calories, highly processed foods and overconsumption," the study concludes. These factors promote obesity – so we now live in a world where many people are both overweight and malnourished. The challenge is to promote a food system that moves "its focus from quantity to dietary quality and health," The authors conclude. The study authors include researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, DC, and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Australia

The authors argue that several actions are needed to meet the challenges: increased investments in fruit and vegetables production; increased efforts to educate people about the importance of healthy diets; and – given that about one-third of food produced globally is wasted – new technologies and practices to reduce food waste

The predictions for fruit and vegetable shortfalls are based on modeling. The researchers draw on food production data, but there is uncertainty in their estimates given given factors such as lack of data on global waste.

Nonetheless, they forecast that several countries will make gains in the availability of produce – such as India and Morocco. But Mexico and several countries in Central and South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Pacific region will probably fail to have adequate supplies.

Another new release released Tuesday, from the World Resources Institute, focuses on how to reform the food system to improve the health of the planet. It's a deep-dive that has been years in the making by a group of widely respected, science-based analysts.

They argue that we need to close three key gaps to feed the projected 9.8 billion people that will inhabit the planet by 2050: food gap, land gap and greenhouse gas gap

Consider this: The the difference between the amount of food produced in 2010 and the amount we need by 2050 is estimated 7,400 trillion calories according to the report. Yes, the number is so big that it's hard to imagine it. But the bottom line is, we need to get more calories from the world's current cropland.

One way to do this is through improvements in breeding and technological advances. The report spells out other fixes, including reducing the use of biofuels that divert edible crops to produce energy and reducing food waste. (ReFED has set out these cost-effective strategies to cut food waste).

Yet another proposed fix: Nudge people towards a more plant-centered diet. Currently, agriculture uses nearly half of the globe's vegetated land – and at least 30 percent of all cropland is used to grow feed for animals. The resource intensiveness of meat production is a leading cause of deforestation. If current trends continue, the WRI report estimates that we would need an extra 593 million hectares – an area that is almost twice the size of India – to feed the population in 2050.

Currently agriculture and land-use changes Related to producing food – such as plowing and clearing vegetation – generate an estimated 25 percent of annual greenhouse gas emissions, according to WRI. If today's consumption trends continue, but agricultural productivity does not rise (beyond 2010 levels), the report concludes that we would have to clear most of the world's remaining forests to feed the world.

Ruminant livestock (including cattle, sheep and goats) use an estimated two- thirds of all land dedicated to agriculture and contribute about half of the greenhouse gas emissions related to agriculture. Demand for meat is growing as more people, in more countries, they can afford it. But the report concludes that cutting back on ruminant meat consumption could have a significant impact.

The WRI estimates that if people in the U.S. and other heavy meat-eating countries reduced their consumption of beef (and other meat from ruminants) to about 1.5 burgers per person, per week, it would "almost eliminate the need for additional agricultural expansion (and associated deforestation) even in a world with 10 billion people. " (The Better Buying Lab, an arm of WRI that focuses on getting people to eat more sustainably, has come up with some clever research-backed marketing ideas to get people to make the plant-centric switch.)

The WRI's new findings is similar to the recommendation made earlier this year by the EAT-Lancet study. The meat industry-funded group has responded to calls for cuts in meat consumption with its own analysis that concludes limiting meat and dairy consumption would have negative consequences. In this analysis, Animal Farm Alliance concludes that meat and dairy products provide "unmatched nutrition for healthy bodies, brains and bones." The analysis also concludes that "US farmers and ranchers continue to make huge strides in conserving natural resources and protecting the environment."

As the population continues to grow, conversations around how to change the food system to promote good health and environmental sustainability will go on.


Source link