قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ In Venezuela, socialism has succeeded, as always

In Venezuela, socialism has succeeded, as always



A writer for the left-wing magazine Nation made a statement in 2013, "Yes, the Venezuelan president may be strong" after the death of the Venezuelan dictator. "But he leaves behind what can be called the most democratic country in the Western Hemisphere.

Such are the delusions of socialism. Chavez, who was legally elected in 1998, quickly took off destroying the democratic institutions of Venezuela. Taking advantage of the weak and very easily changing national constitution, he cascades the elected legislative power and destroys the independence of the judiciary. In this way he increased his own strength at home. Overseas, he began work on undermining the democratic governments of other countries in his neighborhood, and subsidizing the repressive regime of Cuba with cheap oil.

Chavez's profitable sectors of Venezuela were systematically expropriated by the state. As a result, they quickly failed. Oil yield, the base of the strongest economy in South America, has fallen. Soon the high oil prices of the last decade have also dropped. This meant that in order to preserve the flow of benefits for the poor who had held it to power ̵

1; to keep the mask of a smile, happy socialism – Chavez began to inflate the currency, destroying the savings of its citizens and driving international investments from the country. Chavez died before the last collapse he had started. When Venezuela plunged into lawlessness, political violence and acute shortages, his successor, Nichola Maduro, took over the ruins. The Venezuelans are now literally losing weight and starving and having socialism that is democratic (at least until 2015) to thank for their indifference. Children die of lack of meals and go without medical help because Maduro refuses to remove the state economic model that has caused the disaster.

Price control made it impossible to buy the basic daily commodities at any price. People who criticize Maduro can expect to be held as political prisoners. If they gather in cash, they can expect a violent reaction from the government-backed red shirts that have beaten and killed the anti-government protesters with impunity.

Inappropriate or unwilling to take responsibility for destroying the economy of the nation, Maduro periodically arrests and persecutes owners of shop owners who fail to buy goods they can not get, and baker who fails to make bread at a loss. Like the economic problems that it always creates, another important characteristic of socialism is the inability to accept guilt for creating the problems.

So once the richest state in South America, with more proven reserves of oil than Norway or Saudi Arabia, has become a failed state. Its democracy is undermined, its military and police are corrupt, its money is useless and people can not get basic needs. Venezuela has used to export, but today its only exports are people. This is the way socialism always works everywhere it tries. From this point of view, this is a stunning success in Venezuela.

In 2015, Venezuelan voters finally took Maduro's power or thought they had done so by choosing a surcharge in the National Assembly. In response, Maduro created an illegal parallel legislative body that would allow him to ignore the constitutional one. His deceptive elections last spring led directly to today's crisis.

Juan Guaydo, the President of the National Assembly of Venezuela, was named temporary president this week at the end of Maduro's mandate. He wisely offers amnesty for the corrupt military officers who have so far supported the Maduro regime. With the official support of the United States, he has a realistic chance to save his country from further devastation from socialism. Or maybe it will fail, and the unfolding tragedy will continue. In any case, the lesson from Venezuela is one that American voters must take into account. Chavez destroyed his country's prosperity very quickly, and unlike most socialists, he did so while winning democratic elections.

Never forget this when you hear that American politicians today call themselves socialists even when they change it, calling themselves "democratic socialists." Ultimately, socialism inevitably produces coercion and ends freedom. These politicians are in a position to support a system that has turned its miracle into annihilation in Venezuela, Cuba, Russia and many other countries before.


Source link