قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Iowa Poll: Pete Butigigig rises first

Iowa Poll: Pete Butigigig rises first



Studying the rest of the field, no other candidate receives double-digit support. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar lands at 6%, with five candidates registering 3% – Sensory Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kamala Harris of California, Republic of Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, investor Tom Steyer and businessman Andrew Yang. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has not yet formally announced a 2020 bid, receives 2%. The rest of the field gets 1% or less.

Butigigig's significant growth comes after a tumultuous investment of time and money in Iowa. In the last few months, he has built one of the largest on-site operations in the country, complemented by a steady publicity campaign and strong public appearances, including a speech at the largest Democratic Party event of the year earlier this month in Des Moines.

His elevated position in Iowa is based on strong support in various demographic groups. He does about as well with self-identified Democrats as he does with independents. It also presents much the same with previous corn as first graders. And its support is almost even in cities, suburbs, towns and rural areas.

  Pete Butigigig seeks increasing organizing power in optimistic speech in Iowa

[196545] Mayor is doing a little better among those with incomes over $ 100,000 (32%) and self-described moderates (32%). Its value in Union households (17%) and those who call themselves very liberal (12%) is lower than its overall average.

Among the candidates vying for second place in this poll, Sanders has the most variation in terms of demographic groups. His support among those who describe themselves as very liberal (34%) is nearly 20 points higher than his overall position. Like Sanders, Warren did better with this group (32%) than his overall situation.

Sanders also handled younger probable rubbers better, receiving 27% of those under 35, compared to Butigig at 20%, Warren at 18% and Biden at 9%. Butigigig (28%) and Biden (27%), meanwhile, diverge even among the oldest cornfields – those 65 and older – a group the former vice president led by more than 20 points in September. For Buttigieg, his support for the oldest probable rubbers marked a significant jump of 7% from his value in September.

Biden's core strength remains a factor of elegance. Of the four candidates tested, the former Vice President earns the most confidence in his ability to defeat Trump. The majority of probable rubbers (52%) say they are almost certain or relatively confident that Biden can win next November, compared with 43% who say they are not very confident or almost sure they will lose.

Another factor This indicates Buttigieg's status as a frontrunner is 68% of likely Democratic carolers who say he is their first or second choice or is considered active, over 55% in September. Warren is close to 66%, though it was slightly less than 71% in September when it topped the field.

The Massachusetts senator is the second choice of 20% of probable rubbers, followed by Butigig at 14% and Sanders and Biden at 13%. Harris is now the second choice by 7%, down from 14% in June – though 36% say they are still actively considering it.

The only candidates other than Butigig and Warren hit 50% when combining first and second choice and active thinking were Biden with 58% (versus 60% in September) and Sanders with 55% (versus 50% in September). Harris is now at 46%, up nine points from her September result.

Butigi's improved position may also be due to his high favorable rating among probable rubbers – 72% – the best in the field and three points over September, Favorable Warren at 71%, followed by Biden at 64% and Sanders by 61%.

The candidates who saw the biggest gains in their favorable ratings since September were Steyer (up 10 points to 37%) and Jan (up seven points to 43%). Booker and Harris both sank eight points in terms of favorability, falling to 52% and 55% respectively. Bloomberg, meanwhile, saw its favorable rating fall eight points from March to 19%. This coincides with a sharp increase in its unfavorable rating – by 20 points to 58%, with 30% having a very unfavorable view of Bloomberg.

The principle of Goldilocks

This may also apply to porridge applies to politics.

In the case of Butigig, 63% of probable rubbers consider his views to be correct, the highest of the four candidates tested. Only 7% say his views are too liberal, while 13% say they are too conservative.

Biden ranks second in the "around the right" category with 55%, though this is a decrease of 70% who said this in March. Like Butigig, 7% say his views are too liberal. But 28% say Biden's views are too conservative.

Nearly half of probable rubbers (48%) say Warren's views are correct, compared with 38% who think her views are too liberal. Most of the likely rubbers (53%) think Sanders' political views are too liberal, compared to 44% in March. Only 37% say his views are correct.

This split within the Democratic Party is also reflected in how likely the calendars feel about the way candidates approach political positions. The majority of likely carolers (52%) would prefer the Democratic candidate to advocate for policies that have a high chance of becoming law, even if the changes are not so great. This compares with 36% who want the nominee to make major changes, even if there is less chance of these reforms becoming law.

As can be expected, the majority of Butigig (62%) and Biden (60%) supporters prefer changes that are more likely to be accepted. The majority of Warren's supporters (58%) and Sanders (54%) want a major change, even if there is a better chance of becoming law.

The election argument

For these Democrats, defeating President Trump remains a priority.

Nearly two-thirds of probable rubbers (63%) say it is more important for them to be the winner of a wagon to be a candidate with a greater chance of defeating Trump. About one-third (32%) say they want a candidate who shares their positions on major issues.

Although there is more confidence in Biden's ability to win next November, feelings about Warren and Butigig are more evenly divided on this point. For Warren, 46% are almost certain or relatively confident that she will prevail, the same as a share that says she is not very sure or almost sure that she will lose. For Buttigieg, this is from 46% to 43%. The difference in elegance between Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden ” data-src-mini=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-small-169.jpg” data-src-xsmall=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-medium-plus-169.jpg” data-src-small=”http://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-large-169.jpg” data-src-medium=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-exlarge-169.jpg” data-src-large=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-super-169.jpg” data-src-full16x9=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-full-169.jpg” data-src-mini1x1=”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/191015153914-02-joe-biden-elizabeth-warren-split-small-11.jpg” data-demand-load=”not-loaded” data-eq-pts=”mini: 0, xsmall: 221, small: 308, medium: 461, large: 781″ src=”″/>

This represents a weakness for Sanders,% says 40% that they are almost certain or relatively confident in his chances against Trump compared to 53% who are not very confident or almost sure he will lose.

Among Biden's supporters, 57% say they are almost certain that he will beat Trump. Proponents of other contenders are not so pink. That's 48% for Sanders, 35% for Warren and 27% for Buttigig's supporters. Despite all of Buttigieg's strengths in this poll, the lack of confidence among his own supporters in his prospects of defeating Trump may be a warning sign given the importance of the eligibility factor for Democrats.

Commitment and enthusiasm

With colleagues who are less than three months old, there is evidence that more voters have made the decision. Among likely Democrats, 30% say they have a candidate for the first election they have decided to support. This is a 10-point increase since September, but still leaves enough room for preferences to shift before February.

Sanders is the best choice among those who decide by 28%, followed by Butigig with 22%, Biden at 14% and Warren at 12%. In fact, 57% of Sanders' supporters say they are committed to supporting the senator, while less than 30% of Biden, Butigig, and Warren's supporters say their minds are up.

Meanwhile, Butigigig is among those who could still be persuaded by 29%, followed by Warren by 20%, Biden by 16% and Sanders by 10%.

Not only are Sanders supporters more engaged, they are also the most enthusiastic. Most of the Vermont senator supporters (51%) describe themselves as extremely enthusiastic about their choices. That compares to 35% for Warren, 33% for Butigig and 25% for Biden.

  & # 39; From the bottom of my heart: Bernie Sanders bounces when health frightens

In a sign of potential weakness for Biden, 27% of his supporters say they are soft whether or not they are enthusiastic about their choice. That compares to 18% for Sanders, 17% for Butigig and 16% for Warren.

There seems to be an early enthusiasm for democratic causes in 2020, as 63% now say they definitely rather than likely cackle in February. By comparison, the latest Iowa poll released before the opening of the caboose in 2008, 53% said they would definitely attend.

Here, Warren leads the pack with 72% of her supporters, saying she will definitely cackle compared to 63% for Sanders, 60% for Buttigieg and 59% for Biden.

The CNN / Des Moines / Mediacom Registry Study was conducted by Selzer & Co. from Des Moines, Iowa, Nov. 8-13, among a random sample of 500 probable Democratic coaches reached on landlines or cell phones by a live interviewer. The results for the full sample of probable maize varieties have a difference in sampling error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.


Source link