According to Reuters, US District Court Judge Vince Chabria in San Francisco Evidence support $ 5.27 million compensation payable by the Bayer of Edwin Hardman, the damage has to be reduced from $ 75 million to $ 20 million, and he also found that the ratio of penalties and compensatory damages is too high, "especially in the absence of evidence of deliberate concealment of a known or obvious safety risk."  The Wall Street Journal reports that while Chhabria has discovered mixed scientific evidence about whether Roundup exposure is a risk factor for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, he writes that "court evidence dye the picture of a company that is focused on the attack or kicking people who have caused anxiety. The document notes that while Bayer had lost two extra cases relating to Raupe (in one case involving a jury award of more than $ 2 billion) and faced thousands of others, he had success by limiting payouts:
Bayer also succeeded to conduct a trial, the judge cut the first jury sentence from Roundup in the Port of San Francisco Bay area to $ 78.5 million from $ 289.2 million. The company is now appealing this reduced amount. Bayer asks the judge to reduce the third jury sentence, also in northern California, to more than $ 2 billion awarded in May to a couple using Roundup at home.
In the process of Mr Hardman, unlike the other two, the jury first weigh out whether science shows a link between Rundfun and his non-Hodgkin lymphoma before turning to Monsanto's responsibility … The three judgments and 13,000 additional claims linking Rauper to cancer sent the Bayer-based Germany. His shares have lost more than 30% of their value in the past year, as investors worry that the judicial battle may take years to decide and eventually cost Bayer billions. a precedent by the Supreme Court, but he believes the jury's initial prize is reasonable.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization (IARC) considers that the main ingredient of Roundup, glyphosate, the "likely carcinogen" in 2015 – a position supported by a study this year on glyphosate exposure, is associated with a significantly higher risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hardman says he used the herbicide of a large estate north of San Francisco for more than two decades.
Monsanto insists that Roundup is safe, but the court documents show that it was intended to observe the alleged "independent" assessments of its safety. The official position of the Environmental Protection Agency is also that Roundup is safe when used in accordance with label instructions, although a former EPA person in charge of safety assessment has faced a suspiciously cozy relationship with Monsanto
. how much risk is really Roundup. Californian University, Riverside toxicologist David Eastman, author of the glyphosate review for the World Health Organization's WHO / WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues, told NPR earlier this year that the IARC simply found that the chemical could to cause cancer without assessing how likely it is
"From my reading of things, if glyphosate causes cancer, it's a very poor carcinogen, which means you'll need a lot of high doses to get it," Eastmond he told NPR, adding that he had based his conclusions on a part of Monsanto-funded studies that have not been reviewed by IARC.
"We are glad that the judge dismissed Monsanto's request to reject the verdict and admitted that Monsanto deserves to be punished," said Jennifer Moore, a member of Hardman's law firm. "We do not agree with any reduction in the jury's verdict." Austrian lawmakers have recently approved a total ban on glyphosate by positioning it as the first EU member state to do so and creating the opportunity for other countries to follow.