قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Judges of the Supreme Court are openly told about the death penalty

Judges of the Supreme Court are openly told about the death penalty



Despite the often-stated goal of Chief Justice John Roberts to keep the Supreme Court over the conflicts that have crippled the government's political branches, there are times when internal debates between judges – and even some snipers – will penetrate.

Judges are still bitterly separated because of the execution of Dominique Ray, who claims his religious rights have been violated because in February he could not have him with him in the executive chamber – so much that they continue to challenge the case in an unrelated opinion published Monday.

Along with the third death sentence, linked to the Buddhist spiritual counselor's request last week, the matter is clearly irritated by the judges. This is likely to intensify now that the addition of justice Brett Cavanah strengthened the conservative propensity of the court.

"Betting is not higher than in the case of capital punishment, and disputes between judges and court squabbles may become stronger and deeper," says Jessica Levinsson, a professor at Loyola Law School. She said the court would probably move to the right in the years to come, and "these three death penalty cases can demonstrate the growing pain of the court as it moves away from the ideological center."

The death penalty experts say that court friction often arises in cases involving lethal injection protocols and last minute requests. "As such, we begin to see these conflicts between judges playing in unusual places and in unusual ways," says Fordham Professor Deborah Deno.

  The Supreme Court ruled against the prisoner with a rare illness

the conservative majority provided very few arguments for his decision let Ray move on. The Alabama prison allowed a Christian priest in the room, but the authorities blocked the imam, claiming that only security prison officials could be present in the room. The 11th US Appellate Court allowed a suspension of execution, but the High Court overturned this residence and cleared the way for the execution, saying that Ray had waited too long – he made the statement less than two weeks before

The order pushes for a fierce disagreement with liberal judges led by justice Elena Kagan, which claims that Ray has claimed "a powerful claim that his religious rights will be violated at the moment the state kills him. . "

She accused the conservative majority of interrupting the" ordinary "process that had to take place in the lower courts" so that the state could meet the desired date of execution. "

RELATED: Predictions evolve, as the Supreme Court is sitting on a case of access to a major abortion

Neil Catal, a former Advocate-General at the Obama administration, said the order would be remembered in the same category as some of the most outrageous Supreme Court statements. "After 100 years, will rightly read about this decision . He can be read alongside Dred Scott, Plessy against Ferguson, Koremutsu and the Chinese deportation cases, "he wrote, also shaking religious conservatives stunned that the conservative majority did not meet the prisoner's request

Last week again the dispute arose when judges clashed with a similar petition from Texas prisoner Patrick Henry Murphy, who claims that the state is violating his religious freedom because he refuses to let his Buddhist spiritual counselor into the chamber because they hold allowed only the Christian and Muslim priests who were prison staff

This time the court left the execution with very few clues that distinguished Murphy's case from Ray's case, only Judge Brett Cavana wrote separately to suppose that the request of Murphy was pleased because he handed it over in time, and judges Neal Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas noted their disagreement, but it was not clear how they voted Roberts or Samuel Alito.

They shone ahead to Monday, when the court issued a statement in the case of a death sentence filed by a prisoner with a request for relief for a completely different set of circumstances outside of Missouri. Russell Bachler says his planned lethal injection will cause "severe harm and suffering" due to the fact that he suffers from a rare and progressive illness.
  The Supreme Court suspends the execution of a prisoner from Texas who wants to allow a Buddhist spiritual counselor in the death chamber

Again the court divided 5-4 in the case, as Gorshhu wrote a letter to the majority and ruled against Buckla.

Thus, Gorush returned to Ray's performance to make a bigger point that "last minute stay should be the ultimate exception."

He accused the dissidents of trying to "resume" Ray's case by saying that Ray's complaint was timely.

In a footnote, Gorshu said that Ray had "long been noticed that he had a question of whether his councilor would be admitted to the room," but he waited "only 15 days before the execution" to ask for clarification. It seemed that Gorshu had departed from his path to better explain the motives behind Ray Ray. It was something that particularly bothered justice Sonya Sotomayor, who denied in her note that the prison had "refused to give Ray" a copy of her own practices.

Even today's late explanation by the majority is based on the mistaken assumption that Dominica Ray could have earlier understood that Alabama is planning to deny access to his Imam to the execution chamber, "Sotomayor writes.

Writing separately, Justice Steven Breyer also cites Ray's case and assumed that the majority acted with unnecessary rush.

It may be that "there is no way to quickly execute a prisoner by giving him the protections that guarantee our constitution," writes Breyer.

  "Chief": John Roberts & # 39; a journey from a "sober kitten" to the top of American law

The public faced with a solution in an earlier case, especially from just two months ago, is rare, said Dino. "It was strange to see the judges discussing the merits of a completely different case that has nothing to do with the case," she said.


Source link