CNN anchor Alicine Camerota replied, "CNN is doing fine."
"He's trying to get us to do our dirty work," Camerota says of Paul on CNN's New Day. Her co-anchor, John Berman, called Paul "the little guy" who acted "cowardly" on stage with President Donald Trump at a rally in Lexington, Kentucky.
In Morning Joe, MSNBC, co-host Willie Gayst said, "Paul went straight to the whistle broadcast line," and "gave some context and some details that we won't give here this morning."  news organizations have not identified the offender whose allegations about Trump, who pressures Ukraine to investigate the allegations, are largely corroborated and even expanded by officials testifying in the impeachment investigation ̵
Mark S. Zaid, the lawyer for the culprit, told POLITICO that several news organizations had informed him that they believed they knew the offender's identity – which the lawyer did not confirm or deny – but that the outlets were not currently publishing a name.
"Their position was, we will not be an entity that reveals that person's identity," Zaid said, adding that it was unclear what news organizations would do if Trump disclosed it himself, "or retweet another media report."
So far, it seems that only a small cable television channel in support of the president and an allegedly non-partisan news site have published the alleged name of the whistle.
Trump has not retweeted these stories in front of his tens of millions of followers, but he and his political and media boosters have stepped up calls for offenders. "I say to the media tonight: do your job and print his name," said Paul at a rally in support of Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, who is ready for re-election Tuesday
While there are federal protections for whistleblowers violations, the media is not prohibited from naming the individual. ch it is in the public interest to identify the whistleblower while weighing the possible consequences, such as retaliation against a government official going through the right channels to raise concerns about possible abuse.
In late September, Times editor Dean Bucket defended the publication of "restricted information" about the offender, such as the CIA employee, "because we wanted to provide information to readers that allows them to make their own judgments about whether or not it is plausible. "
Bakket added that the White House already knew that a CIA employee was a CIA employee.
The Washington Post also described the whistle-blower at the end of September as a CIA employee, but did not appear to have disclosed additional details in recent weeks.
The USA Today Editorial Board argued on Monday against the disclosure of the name, saying that "nothing loosens truth-telling in power halls like a risk of retaliation, and no risk is more serious than revealing a potential inevitable crimes by the president. "reported that" so much of the person's complaint was independently vetted. "
The reporters of the whistleblower, Zaid and Andrew P. Bakay, made a similar argument in a Washington Post announcement, he writes that "now the public knows more about the conversation with Ukraine than what was in the complaint, and so identifying their client is "no longer relevant".