Megan Markle may have been wrong about her son’s royal title during her interview with Oprah Winfrey in March, her biographer said.
Omid Scoby, co-author of Finding Freedom, said the Duchess of Sussex may have misinterpreted the royal rules when she said that Archie was not a prince due to a change in protocol and was treated differently by his cousins. to a recent report.
Unlike the children of Prince William – Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis – Archie, who turns two this month, has no royal title.
In an interview with CBS, Markle said he wanted her to have the title of the security guard who came with him. “All the greatness about these things is not really important to me,” she said during the interview.
“If we only deal with what Megan told Oprah and what the palace has said so far about the situation with Archie, it may be possible that Megan is wrong in her interpretation of this,” said Scobie, whose comments are included in Discovery, a new documentary, Harry and Megan: Memories Can Vary.
“But we also know that there are many more things in this story that we don’t know about,” he continued.
Under the rules established in 1917, HRH titles were given only to the children and grandchildren of the monarch and the eldest grandson of the Prince of Wales.