قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Sport https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ NCAA Protests Against California Bill Allowing College Athletes to Benefit from Approvals

NCAA Protests Against California Bill Allowing College Athletes to Benefit from Approvals



California will allow college athletes to make money off the use of their names, images and likeness by a bill passed by the state Legislature on Wednesday and targeted by Gov. Newsom's government.

Legislation has attracted national attention, with athletes such as NBA stars LeBron James and Draymond Green praising California's potential to give college athletes a share of the wind they help create for their universities and the National Collegiate Assn. The Senate gave final approval to Senate Bill 206 by Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) in a vote of 39-0. The Assembly passed the 73-0 bill on Monday.

But the NCAA has forcibly turned against the bill, saying it has the potential to kill amateur athletics if it becomes law. The NCAA sent Newsom a letter Wednesday calling the legislation "unconstitutional" and "harmful."

"If the bill becomes law and the 58 NCAA schools in California are forced to allow an unlimited name, image and likeness scheme, it will eliminate the critical distinction between college and professional athletics, and because it gives those schools a disloyal advantage to recruiting would ultimately prevent them from competing in NCAA competitions, "the letter said.

NCAA President Mark Emert and 21

other members of the board of governors signed the letter. June Emmer sent a letter to h The lawmakers of the state in which it warned of grave consequences if the bill were passed.

Skinner dismissed NCAA warnings as empty threats and said Wednesday that law scholars had concluded that her bill was in fact constitutional.

"The NCAA she has repeatedly lost antitrust cases in courts across the country, "Skinner said. "As a result, threats are their primary weapon."

The NCAA prohibits athletes from being compensated for using their names, images or likeness. The bill does not allow schools to pay athletes directly, but will allow students to receive compensation from outside sources – such as a video game company or signing autographs or monuments.

Lawmakers supporting the bill provided examples of other situations in which college athletes are unable to earn money for their services, which they said simply did not seem fair: a collegiate swimmer who prevented him from teaching lessons in swimming, volleyball player who can't put on summer camp, or baseball player who can't promote autobiographical

"Forget shoe deals and video games, NCAA athletes can't make a little money in summer coaching youth sports, can't promote social media can not modeled sportswear, can not accept food or help with rent or equipment, "said assistant Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin). "When a line in the sand is obsessive, excessive and absurd, it is usually a sign that it is not there."

The bill moved through the Legislature despite a letter from NCAA President Emmert in June. Emert urged lawmakers to delay decision-making until, after a group of college presidents, conference commissioners, athletic directors and athletes examined whether such a financing agreement could exist "in a manner consistent with core values, mission and NCAA principles. " This report is expected next month.

Emert's letter reads in part: "[W] a hen is in conflict with the current NCAA rules, because the draft bill threatens to substantially change the principles of intercollegiate athletics and create local differences that would make it impossible to house a nationality. championships. As a result, it is likely to have a negative impact on the exact student-athletes it intends to help. "

The bill, addressed to Newsom, will prohibit the NCAA from prohibiting the university from competing if its athletes are offset in early January. 1, 2023 Proponents of the bill argue that the delayed implementation gives NCAA time to make changes to its rules and allows California to introduce future legislation if changes are needed to ensure that schools are not penalized.

The bill prohibits athletes from engaging in endorsement deals that conflict with their team contract. SB 206 does not apply to community college athletes.

"Our name, image and likeness were given to us by our parents and our Creator," says Ramogie Huma, a former UCLA football player who is the executive director of National Collegiate Assoc. Assoc., Who is pushing for college reform. "It is dehumanizing for the NCAA to require full ownership of the players' identity as a condition of participating in college sports. The players are people who are not university-owned. This is particularly offensive given that most California athletes and players elsewhere are minorities and women. "

The Pac-12 Conference refers to its previous statement on the bill, in which the legislature required the legislation to delay action until the NCAA Task Force completed its study of

earlier in committee hearing this year, Long Beach State athletic director Andy Fee warned of "many potential and unwanted consequences" if the bill becomes law.

"I fear the different possibility of a scenario in which California schools may be expelled for intentionally violating NCAA rules," said Fe. "If California schools are expelled, the student-athletes themselves with whom the bill intends to help, would be adversely affected. "


Source link