قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Health https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Nutrition Coach Reveals The Worst Myth Of Metabolism People Still Believe

Nutrition Coach Reveals The Worst Myth Of Metabolism People Still Believe



Weight loss is like sticking to a steeply sloping treadmill with a broken shut-off switch. But it doesn't have to be that way. In fact, throw away this metabolism myth, and this rabid path may start to feel more like a gentle downhill slope.

Like Graham Tomlinson, a nutrition coach who recently revealed the name of a fitness chef, finds out in a world where people take nutrition from Instagram Stories, their influencer workouts and their 10-second Facebook feed plans , it's easier than ever to make good on the promise of a "metabolism-boosting diet"

But according to Graeme, the truth is contrary to what a select group of fitness gurus decided in 2006 "doesn't need alter the metabolism of your bodies [sic] to lose fat.

Find this post Instagram [19659007]

"Metabolism" (noun) is a "chemical processes taking place in the living body in order to maintain life." ⁣ ⁣ This is the definition of a metabolic event. This happens in thousands of complex ways every day to ensure that we survive. As early as 2006, several fitness gurus decided that you needed to change your metabolic functions in order to lose fat. Thus, they set out the concept of "speeding up metabolism" to optimize fat loss. Their logic and evidence remains unproven and unknown. And given that fat loss requires being in an energy deficit, it sounds logical to claim that we can burn more calories by digesting our food regularly – because we can. But the main disadvantage of this concept is that the calories we eat are also counted in the energy balance – and they account for a hell of a lot more than the energy used to metabolize food. ⁣ ⁣ The truth is that regularly consuming food as a means of boosting your metabolism is just another unnecessary and unfounded myth for fat loss. If you were to consume 1800 calories a day for six 300 calories, you would probably burn about 10% during digestion (30 calories burned and 180 in total). But if you consume 1,800 calories a day for two 900 calorie meals, using the same principle, you'll burn 90 calories per meal and still 180 in total. Trying to change your metabolism to lose fat is another pointless, pseudoscientific process that blurs your mind. Because when it comes to fat loss, eating regularity doesn't matter. You don't have to eat breakfast if you don't want to. You can eat big meals less often if it suits your daily routine. ⁣ ⁣ Keeping to a realistic, sustainable calorie deficit for a period of time will lead to a progressive loss of unwanted fat – we need to remember that. 🙂 -⁣ -⁣ #fatloss #metabolism #losefat #caloriedeficit #caloriecounting #fatlossjourney #dieting #balancediet #eatsmart #snacktime #fatlosstips #losebellyfat #calories #fatlosscoach #diet #slimmingworld 19] RaGraeme Tomlinson [19] RaGraeme Tomlisson [19] August 2019 at 10:07 PDT

According to Graeme, the "logic and evidence" of diets that promote consistent eating to accelerate a person's metabolism remain "unproven and unknown. "1945

" If we take the metabolic process involved in the digestion of food (thermos effect of eating), we know that this process uses energy, "he says. "Given that fat loss requires you to have an energy deficit, it sounds logical to claim that we can burn more calories by digesting our food regularly – because we can."

The problem? The calories we eat are also counted in our energy balance and "they account for a hell of a lot more than the energy used to metabolize food." Just another unnecessary and unfounded myth for fat loss. If you were to consume 1800 calories a day for six 300 calories, you would probably burn about 10% during digestion (30 calories burned and 180 in total). But if you consume 1,800 calories a day for two 900 calorie meals, using the same principle, you'll burn 90 calories per meal and still 180 in total. It ends the same. "

" Trying to change your metabolism to lose fat, "adds Graham," is another senseless, pseudoscientific process that obscures a person's mind. "According to Graeme, the implications are twofold. First: you don't have to eat breakfast if you don't want to. And second, you can eat big meals less often if it suits your daily routine. 19

So, although Graeme has had struggles with Keto dieters in the past when it comes to the importance (or lack thereof) of eating regularly, he seems to be on the same page.

On the whole, however, it still differs from low carbohydrates in that, in its view, "sticking to a realistic, sustainable calorie deficit for a certain period of time" is more important for weight loss than for cutting certain food groups in favor of protein and fat.

Read Next


Source link