قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Science https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ One-third of Americans support nuclear war in North Korea, knowing it will kill a million, the report said.

One-third of Americans support nuclear war in North Korea, knowing it will kill a million, the report said.



A third of the US population will support a preventive attack on North Korea, even in a nuclear scenario, knowing it will kill a million innocent people, according to a recent study

The Bulletin of the Nuclear Scientists in collaboration with the UK- YouGov has published a new study on Monday describing US public opinion on the military conflict with North Korea at a time when the pace of a historic peace process between long-standing competitors seems to be slowing. Among the most "worrying" results, "there is a large minority in the US audience, over one third of respondents approve of US scenario preventive shots and appear insensitive to information signals that most security experts expect to reduce such levels of "

Little changed when the first US hit was shifted from conventional to nuclear as" 33 per cent preferred. "In fact," there is no significant change in the percentage that would prefer or approve a nuclear attack in C As the number of calculated North Korean deaths increased from 1

5,000 to 1.1 million, including 1 million civilians. "

The results actually show a previously established pattern among the public in the United States, which" shows only a limited dislike of use of nuclear weapons and a shocking desire to support the killing of enemy civilians. "

  North Korea China kim pyongyang
Little man watches people watching TV news showing pictures of Chinese President Ci Jingpin's meeting with North Korean supreme Air Kim Jong-un in Pyongyang public square in front of the main railway station in the capital June 21. One-third of those questioned in the United States would support a preliminary military strike against North Korea, knowing that it would kill truth. The United States remains the only country in the world to use nuclear weapons in the fight against atomic bombing in August 1945 in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing them. about 250,000 people. Over the decades, nuclear weapons have only exponentially increased in force, and North Korea – created with South Korea when the Second World War allies, the Soviet Union and the United States divided the peninsula occupied by Japan shortly after the attacks – managed to develop its own nuclear arsenal, international sanctions.

North Korea's closing nuclear program was the goal of several consecutive US administrations, but President Donald Trump hopes to overcome the news by becoming the first to meet the North Korean ruler with his debut summit with top Kim Kim Chen Un in Singapore last year. The two agreed to go ahead with a nuclear peacekeeping process, but even the subsequent negotiations in the Hanoi capital in February failed to make a deal.

While accusing countries on the other side of obvious stalls in nuclear talks, Trump and Kim managed to maintain friendly relations demonstrated by their affinity to write letters to another. Sometimes their expressions of admiration were far from initial impressions of Trump's entry into the office in 2017, a year in which the two threats of exchange were nuclear.

The couple may have changed their tone a lot, but many others remain skeptical as Washington has insisted on its unconditional "complete, verifiable, irreversible denouterilization" approach. If Trump and Kim's relationship suffered weakness, even more participants in the study on Monday said they would support the president in taking action.

"Under all conditions, the approval of the American strike is a particularly (albeit not always meaningful) sense higher than preferences, which means that a number of respondents give up their personal preferences in favor of the president," the report said. For example, while only 33% of the public in the United States opts for a US Preemptive Nucleus that will kill 15,000 North Koreans, 50% approve. "

  North Korea Trump
President Donald Trump and North Korean High Commander Kim Jong Un smile at a meeting of the second cr in North Korea at Sofitel Legend Metropole Hotel in Hanoi on February 28. While blaming each other for failing to reach an agreement during the last round of talks, the two men continue to express their admiration for each other
The responses were influenced by political beliefs as most respondents opposed military action against North Korea, "the majority of Trump supporters prefer US strike in all scenarios, unless the credibility of the US conventional strike is 50 percent "- and even then it remains at 44 percent, as opposed to only 8 percent for non-supporters. Separately, those who supported the death penalty are actually more eager to cause more North Korean civilian casualties.

When the number of expected deaths in North Korea increased from 15,000 to 1,1 million, the preference for nuclear use among respondents supports the death penalty which has increased from 38% 49% (although this is not a statistically significant change), "the report said. "One of the respondents who supported the death penalty and the US nuclear shock in this scenario explained:" This is our best chance of eliminating the North Koreans. " Another simply said: "to put an end to North Korea." On the other hand, nuclear preference among those opposed to the death penalty has declined from 26% to 7% within the same two scenarios. "

The study revealed" how deeply disinformed Americans about US offensive and defensive military capabilities, "partly accusing Trump's misleading allegations, more than one-third of respondents believe the United States can extract North Korea's nuclear weapons into a round of strikes and up to 74% believe the US will be able to capture three of the incoming northern states. " Korean nuclear missiles – two statements deeply controversial by experts.

The study ended with a call to "renewing mass public nuclear education efforts," and scientists and social scientists "can communicate the facts and therefore influence the calculations of an informed public."


Source link