However, because Pelosi broke the White House’s offers, arguing that they were not good enough and would not meet the needs of the American public, some Democrats called on her to make a long-elusive deal. She insisted on her case in private talks, citing the White House’s recent offer as a “foundation mess” that the president could use for his own political gain, according to two Democrats in talks with her, who spoke on condition of anonymity. discuss them. Her argument is that the White House could try to use some of the money based on Trump̵
However, there is a growing concern that if the speaker does not say ‘yes’ to something soon, voters may wait months for financial aid and the economy could deteriorate sharply during this period.
“When families and businesses are hurt and we seem to have to wait until February for action, we just can’t turn down any help,” said spokesman Josh Gotheimer (DN.J.), the leader of a bipartisan problem-solving problem. , who has been encouraging the lecturer to make a deal for weeks. “I’m sure there are areas for improvement, but we need to stay on the table until we can get this through the finish line.”
Pelosi’s position makes politicians on both sides wince. Shortly after midnight on Thursday morning, Trump turned directly to Pelosi’s approach, writing on Twitter that “Nancy Pelosi cannot be less interested in the American people or the great American worker. She needs to approve the necessary INCENTIVE now. Most other Dems agree. Republicans are ready to go, I’m ready to sign !!! ”
Trump’s tweet greatly overestimated the GO’s appetite for a deal as Republicans in the Senate revolted against the administration’s insistence on a giant new bill.
But the issue is a sensitive topic for the speaker. Politics, she often argues, has nothing to do with her position, and suggestions to the contrary can infuriate her. On Tuesday night, for example, the balanced Pelosi was so outraged by CNN presenter Wolf Blitzer’s suggestions that she left “the perfect one to be the enemy of good” to accuse him of being an apologist for a CSO who didn’t know what he was talking about.
The issue is also extremely sensitive in the House of Democrats in parliament, where some Democrats want Pelosi to make a deal, but are also afraid to call a powerful spokesman by name.
No one wants to undermine Pelosi’s negotiating hand, and most of the group continues to support her approach.
Yet, as millions of Americans lose their jobs and become increasingly desperate, some lawmakers are becoming increasingly vocal about their risks of failing to reach an agreement quickly. Congress has not passed a law in April to approve any new economic relief or health care spending for the pandemic, and Democrats fear that if Trump loses the election, he will not be in the mood to bargain.
“I’d like to see a deal now,” said spokesman Tom Malinowski (DN.J.), a freshman from a vulnerable area. “And what’s important to me is not the amount in dollars, but knowing that central features like relief from the state and local authorities are funded for at least a few months because the need is immediate and great.
At the very least, some Democrats, including Malinowski, argue that the House should accept the White House-backed package and send it to the Senate, forcing Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) And Senate Republicans to fight him at a time when they were focused on filling the Supreme Court seat.
“I’m afraid that if Trump loses the election, we are ready by February, because he will not be in the mood to help or cooperate with anyone,” Malinowski said.
“If we accept that we really want to make a deal, we can make a deal,” said another House Democrat, Ro. Hannah, of California, whose views Pelosi dismissed in an interview with CNN on Tuesday night, saying he was not familiar with the details of the conversations. “My idea is simple, let’s make sure we don’t walk around empty-handed.
The pressure prompted Pelosi to move to the defense this week: In a private conversation with some of his members on Wednesday, Pelosi reassured her colleagues that she was serious and wanted a deal with the White House.
“Why talk to each other at all if we don’t want an account?” She asked, referring to her ongoing talks with Finance Minister Stephen Mnuchin, according to a person familiar with her comments, who spoke on condition of anonymity to reveal.
She then noted a number of problems with the White House’s latest offer for a $ 1.8 trillion package, including the inclusion of business liability protections, which is not a start for Democrats. Other liberal members of the parliamentary group backed Pelosi, according to people in the conversation, arguing that the White House plan would harm the disadvantaged.
“We can’t have a deal going backwards,” Pelosi told the group.
Some lawmakers worry that Pelosi refuses to make a deal because of the political consequences of Trump’s victory, although virtually no Democrat will say so publicly.
That’s an argument Republicans have been making for months. Representative Tom Reid, the leader of the Republican Republic’s problem-solving group, which published a bilateral roadmap a few weeks ago, accused Pelosi and Senate minority leader Charles E. Schumer (DN.Y.) of putting political prospects ahead positive results.
“They are adamant not to give the president victory so close to the election because they are so close to the copper rings of power, be it the White House or the Senate, and they are ready to make the American people suffer until February … and that’s it. terrifying, “said the New York Republican. “Accept the deal, take a yes.”
For Pelosi, there is not much political orientation to make a deal he does not want before election day. Republicans are currently carrying the weight of voter anger over Trump’s pandemic response, with House Republicans expected to lose their seats in November, according to most political difficulties. Even the most vulnerable Democrats in the Pelosi House are doing far better than many imagined they could take part in the polls, with some taking record withdrawals.
In the Senate, Republicans are privately worried they will lose control of the upper house. And along the presidential path, former Vice President Joe Biden is considered a major favorite, given Trump’s grim assessments.
Faced with a potential political carnage for the Republican Party, Trump has clear imperatives for a deal. Not so for Pelosi, who told her colleagues this week that “I don’t think our lever was bigger.”
In addition, Parliament passed two comprehensive coronavirus relief bills – a $ 3.4 trillion package in May and a narrower version of $ 2.2 trillion earlier this month – until the GOP-led Senate failed to act. Senate Republicans have expressed their disgust with the White House’s $ 1.8 trillion proposal crystal clear, prompting Pelosi’s allies to wonder why the burden should be on it after the Senate has not acted and the White House can’t even put Republicans queue behind the president’s own proposal.
“The time for action was months ago, when the House first acted,” said spokesman Robin Kelly (D-Ill.).
Pelosi announced the case publicly and privately that a second agreement would allow the president to put his name on incentive checks without delivering policy and funding results to meet current requirements.
If Pelosi waits, she could instead negotiate with the Biden administration, which is more likely to support the huge relief package the spokesman has been pushing for since May. This week, she told her colleagues that any deal would have retroactive effect, an attempt to compensate for the suffering Americans have suffered while negotiations are lagging behind.
Still, waiting is risky. At present, Trump is more desperate than ever because of his bad grades and the position that Biden lags behind in the polls. However, if he wins the re-election, he may not be such a desirable partner. And if he loses, he may not. Pelosi is due to resume talks with Mnuchin on Thursday, and none have said they are giving up on hopes of a deal.