But there is a clear problem with her claim, as Zaid pointed out shortly. Zaid, an Independent, has never represented Clinton or Sumer. In a speech to CNN Business, Zaid said he sighed and shook his head when he saw the segment. He then began working on a 13-part Twitter post that corrected the entry. About 30 minutes later he published it.
"To be clear, I have never represented Senator Schumer or Secretary Clinton at any time. Never. Never, Tweed Zaid on October 3, adding that Ingraham probably refers to his co-authorship – Andrew Bakay, who had interned with Sumer and Clinton when he attended college nearly 20 years ago.
"This is a distorted, incomplete omission correction," Zaid told CNN Business. "What they never do is actually put things into context and issues out of context. Okay, Andrew is an intern for Clinton and Sumer. As a college intern. When he was 1
The entire episode is presented with what Zaid said was his struggle to correct the record as misinformation about his client, his company, and I am popping up. It also reflects the willingness of some to reject facts that contradict their preferred narrative.
Zaid, a prominent national security lawyer who has sued both the Democratic and Republican administrations, thinks it is best to take an aggressive stance and directly oppose misinformation. Even small amounts of misinformation – such as the assumption that he or his partner worked legally for Clinton or Sumer – can have a significant impact on society's perception.
"What does it say?" Zaid asked rhetorically as he spoke to CNN Business. "This little knowledge goes a long way? It can easily be reversed. A little misinformation goes a long way."
As part of his strategy, Zaid took to Twitter to cite posts and personalities when instigated. narratives. For example, in a tweet on October 7, he wrote a letter to one of his business colleagues and asked him: "Do you find it interesting when @DailyCaller posts an article about the #whistleblower case and someone claims that I am a" liberal "lawyer , they never reveal that we are their lawyer in 2015. #FOIA case involving #HillaryClinton training for classified information? "
Zaid's tweet was prompted by the story of The Daily Caller, which quotes conservative talk show host Mark Levin, calling his client a" so-called whistleblower "and accusing Zaid of running a" left-wing law firm. "After his tweet, Zaid said
Jeffrey Ingersoll, editor-in-chief of The Daily Caller, told CNN Business that the story was updated "after people with more institutional history" in the publication. quotes Levin, who criticizes Zaid's firm. her website reporters "have no idea" Zaid did work with his investigative team and said the omission was "far from some insidious effort to stain" Zaid. A updated version of the story noted that Zaid "represented conservatives and conservative groups in the past, including the Republican National Committee. "
Zaid stated that he had been using the Internet to ridicule lies about himself and his clients for more than a decade. The practice, Zaid said," is usually not about changing the way people think. " the person or the outcome that he adjusted. Zaid knows that people who push conspiracy theories are usually unable to reason or are either unscrupulous participants without being true to the truth. But he thinks it's worth the push for another reason.
"So there is a written record there so that if someone who is not dead gets on it, he can see the other side," he explained.
That said, Zaid said he did not think he was using an entirely "different messaging strategy" from the days before the Internet. He acknowledged that tweeting made it easier to get his word out, but also emphasized that he had been fighting misinformation campaigns, both left and right, for the better part of his life.
"The truth always matters," Zaid said of his strategy. "And I'm known for frankly telling people the hard facts when they want to believe a story. That's what has always guided me."
Zaid has a portfolio of experience in dealing with important cases. In 1993, Zaid filed a lawsuit against Libya for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, resulting in a $ 2.7 billion deal. In 2003, he filed a lawsuit against then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, which led to an anthrax vaccination vaccination order. And in 2010, he filed a lawsuit against the CIA on behalf of journalist Gareth Graf to obtain documents related to the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl.
These are just a few of the memorable cases he has made in his career. Which means Zaid is used to taking heat. But, he said, this case caused an unprecedented amount of misinformation.
"When you have someone like Sean Hannity giving out false information and tweaking the president, that matters," Zaid told CNN Business.
"It's a little strange for the president to tweet to you," Zaid added, noting that he was accustomed to being attacked, but in this case "the intensity seems to be increasing and increasing."
Trump is attacking "the lawyer at reporters "from his Twitter account in October, wrongly referring to him as a" big Democrat "and a" Democrat lawyer. "
Zaid raises a lot of blame in the current media environment. He noted that" it used to be that you only get your news from the three major networks, regardless of the local newspaper in your area and whatever major newspaper is in your area. " Although he acknowledged that this system had its faults, he stated that it was replaced by one with even more problems.
"Only from an ideological angle drawn by the world will these people, left or right, live and only of which they will believe, "Zaid said.
Zaid added," Anyone can be a journalist with allegations then that blog. No standards apply. There is no control over the accountability of what they write. This has created a much more volatile and dangerous society than we have seen in decades. "
Zaid cited the federalist story, which took hold on the right. – The discovery of the media universe a few weeks ago. The story states that" between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminates the requirement of whistleblowers. infringement, to provide first-hand direct knowledge of alleged violations. "
In a rare statement, the Inspector General debunked this theory, that the form submitted by whistleblowers on 12 August 2019, was the same as the Inspector General had on May 24, 2018. The Inspector General reiterated that, knowing firsthand about an event, there was never a need to file a whistleblower complaint.
"That was a violation" said Zaid. "But even after being corrected by those of us who know on both sides, including the government, saying this is not true, nothing happens. They are not interested in the facts. "
However, Zaid told CNN Business that nothing caught him by heart. He received" nasty voicemails and very nasty emails "since it began to be abusive, but said that is "the same kind of nonsense we've been getting for years, but in greater numbers."
"I'd say nothing surprised me," Zaid said. "I'd say instead that I'm constantly disappointed that reason and intellect does not reign. "