Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Some fear that the CDC is moving too fast with the new COVID mask targeting

Some fear that the CDC is moving too fast with the new COVID mask targeting

Some health experts are wondering if federal officials have moved too quickly in recommending relaxing masks that would allow people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 to remove facial coatings in most indoor and outdoor conditions. And they are proposing that California and local leaders move a little more cautiously in easing mask mandates.

Dr John Swartzberg, an honorary clinical professor in the Department of Infectious Diseases at the University of Berkeley, said: “There is good science to support changing our policies. On the other hand, I̵

7;m surprised they went out with him soon. I would like to have another month under my belt to see how the numbers continue to decline. “

If California starts allowing fully vaccinated people to be without masks in stores, who will check to see if those without masks have actually been vaccinated? Will supermarkets really be interested in checking vaccine cards at the entrance?

“I don’t see any grocery stores confirming that you have been vaccinated. That just won’t happen, “Swartzberg said.

The united food and retailer union, which represents 1.3 million food and retail workers, also questioned the CDC’s move.

“While we all share the desire to return to normal without masks, today’s CDC leadership is confusing and does not consider how it will affect key workers who face frequent exposure to people who have not been vaccinated and refuse to wear masks.” Marc Perone said in a statement the international president of the union. “The main workers are still forced to play police under the guise of buyers … Do they have to become vaccination police now?”

However, grocery stores could choose to simply maintain a policy without masks and without services.

Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, chair of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of San Francisco, wrote on Twitter that the science used in the CDC’s recommendation is sound, “but who bears the burden of implementing the policy?”

Some of the people who are less likely to be vaccinated in America, she said, are working-class people who have been too busy working or caring for their families to get the vaccine. “Are we failing the core workers again?” She asked.

Some fear that the CDC’s course will be reversed and eventually normalized if no masks are worn – without requiring vaccinations. Ultimately, this could harm anyone more likely to remain unvaccinated, such as lower-income residents and those who are black and Hispanic, some of whom want to be vaccinated but have failed to do so. due to factors such as the feeling that they may miss work due to side effects of the vaccine or the inability to get the vaccine from a safe place – reasons mentioned in a recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Other experts believe that the CDC has called well and believe that the new guidelines will entice people to get vaccinated, as long as they see the benefits of vaccination.

“I know that many on Twitter say that the unvaccinated will simply say that they have been vaccinated. Some will do it, but many will not, they will now look at vaccination as something more valuable and will look for it, “wrote Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration.

On Friday, Dr. Rochelle Valensky, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, acknowledged that more details are needed on how relaxing indoor mask requirements would actually work in specific settings where it is unclear who is vaccinated and who doesn’t.

“It was the first step in our direction. And what we really need to do now is look at each of our individual guides for each of these individual settings, say, in an environment of schools or childcare centers or in the workplace: Is this the right thing to do ? “Walensky told ABC ‘Good Morning America.’

Also, in practice, Valensky said it would make sense for different states and counties to take different orders from national guidelines.

“Most of these decisions will have to happen at the jurisdiction level,” Walenski said.

Swartzberg criticized government officials for opening up the economy too quickly twice last year, followed by jumps. The question is whether the mandates to lift the mask too quickly will lead to the burning of California for the third time. Probably not, but it can’t be ruled out, he said.

Schwarzberg said he preferred the view floating earlier this week from Gov. Gavin Newsum, who offered two different ideas on how to ease the mandates in California. His second idea, mentioned on Wednesday, proposes to abolish open masks for masks next month, but perhaps keep closed masks for a little longer.

“Instead of taking giant steps, as I think the CDC did today, I think we need to take small steps towards the same goal,” Swartzberg said. “It simply came to our notice then. But I think we will get safer if we are more careful. “

San Francisco Infectious Diseases Specialist Dr. Monica Gandhi was among the experts who called on the CDC to move faster to raise the guidelines for masks, and was surprised at how quickly federal officials acted on Thursday. She welcomed the news and said science supported the new recommendations.

She said the guidelines for lifting masks for fully vaccinated people would provide an incentive for those who may have postponed the shot.

“People need incentives now,” Gandhi said. “I think it will help the people who are on the fence to go and get vaccinated.”

A complicating issue for local authorities is that the CDC seems to have made its announcement without much hint of what lies ahead, and the result is that state and local officials are left with the difficult task of how to deal with the difficult problem of who is responsible. to determine who has been vaccinated and who can be detected as a result.

Los Angeles County officials were surprised by the details of the CDC announcement and it took nine hours before the governor’s office issued a statement on the new guidelines, saying in a tweet Thursday night that it was reviewing the guidelines and continuing to “encourage all eligible Californians.” to be vaccinated, as we are expected to open fully on June 15. “

“We still have millions of people who haven’t been vaccinated – who haven’t even received a single dose,” Los Angeles County Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer said Thursday. “And every day their number may be small, but every day there are people who become infected.”

As a result, it would be wise, Ferrer said, to take the time to ensure that there are rules in place to ensure the greatest possible safety for people.

The questions that officials need to answer include what it would mean for employees working in the field who, for some reason, may not be able to be vaccinated. The solution, Ferrer said, should not be to create a greater risk of the virus spreading among unvaccinated people at a time when Los Angeles County is trying to reduce the number of cases and continue to open businesses and expand capacity.

The goal is to find rules, “so that everyone feels quite comfortable that we don’t have a lot of exposure that would be unnecessary,” Ferrer said. She added that at least in the near future “it may not be possible to remove all restrictions everywhere”.

According to CNN, Dr. Leana Wen, a former health commissioner in Baltimore, worries that the CDC’s move makes it easier for people who have never wanted to be vaccinated or wear masks to enter stores without face coatings – increasing the risk for people. who cannot be vaccinated, such as children who are too young to be inoculated, or immunocompromised people who are not fully protected by the vaccine.

“We’re putting them at risk now, and I think it actually takes us even further than achieving herd immunity,” Wen said.

Here are the basics of the CDC mask guidelines:

  • Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing.
  • Unvaccinated or partially vaccinated people are still invited to wear masks on almost all internal and most external settings when interacting with people outside their household who may not be vaccinated. (Members of one household of unvaccinated people may be without masks indoors if all others have been vaccinated.)
  • Masks are still required for anyone traveling by public transport, including buses and trains, as well as at airports and train stations.
  • The rules also apply to hospitals, prisons, homeless facilities and other institutional conditions.
  • Local and state rules may be stricter and will remain in force.
  • Unvaccinated people should still wear masks and be vaccinated immediately.

Source link