Robotic vacuum cleaners were things from classic science fiction, alive around Jetson-like homes. This is no longer the case. In fact, they are far more advanced than ever, with models featuring sophisticated sensors, processors, lasers and. The fact is that if you are looking , these robots are useful tools and will do the job.
However, if you live the dream of a vacuum robot, you can return a substantial amount ̵
Despite all this sophistication, however, none of these machines can really replace the mop and human effort.
To choose the best robot vacuum, I spent over 120 hours (that’s a lot of time) testing a tortured group of 12 robotic vacuum cleaners for things like suction power, their ability to perform on carpets and hard floors, and how well they work. presented during each cleaning cycle. Among them are brand new models that have recently been released, leading models and compelling options offered by numerous online retailers. I excluded older models, which probably won’t last much longer. I will continue to update this list periodically as new options hit the market.
Tyler Lisenby / CNET
If someone gives you a blank check and tells you to buy the best robot vacuum, this is the bot you should get. However, the iRobot Roomba S9 Plus costs a whopping $ 1,100. For this stunningly steep sticker price, however, this robotic vacuum provides powerful suction and superb dirt and dust removal.
On hardwood floors, this Roomba collected an average of 93% of our test sand, the largest amount in our test group, but struggles with a little cleaning sand from carpets with low piles and carpets, earning low average dust and 28% sand.
However, the Roomba robot removed an average of 71% sand from our carpet while vacuuming. Again, this is the best result we saw in this particular test. It also cleans more dog hair, pet dandruff and allergens from any vacuum in this test group, and the bot navigates and maps multiple rooms and floors. iRobot has also updated its app to allow you to specify “protection zones” that you want the S9 Plus to avoid when cleaning. The app also allows you to use voice commands to instantly clean a room using Alexa or Google Voice Assistant.
The robot also passed through our test room for a short average time of 25 minutes. You can connect the S9 Plus to the Roomba app and your home Wi-Fi. Best of all is the Rooman S9 Plus Cleanbase docking station. The docking station charges the robot’s battery and automatically empties the dust bucket, which makes cleaning even easier and protects you from worries about battery life. Now this is convenient. Read our first impressions of Roomba S9 Plus.
Tyler Lisenby / CNET
For approximately half the price of the Roomba S9 Plus, Neato’s D7 D7 vacuumed almost dirt, dust and clutter, making it the best robot vacuum at a mid-range price. On average, this robotic cleaner absorbs more sand (36%) on carpets and low-layer carpets than Roomba.
This automatic vacuum cleaner narrowly beat the S9 Plus for power cleaning and on bare hardwood floors, collecting an average of 95% of the sand we left behind. The vacuum cleaner cleans dirt, dust and sand from the carpets in the middle, but less efficiently, reaching an average of 47% during cleaning.
While Neato can’t handle Roomba’s ability to remove pet hair or empty its own dustbin, the D7 moves more efficiently around furniture, but covers more ground thanks to the intelligent vacuum robot built into the lidar laser navigation map. You can also control the cleaning robot using the Neato app as a remote control, as well as connect it to Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant. The application allows you to mark areas of your home as prohibited for cleaning.
Tyler Lisenby / CNET
Here’s a robotic vacuum cleaner that proves you don’t have to inflate your budget to buy a solid robot vacuum cleaner. Although the Robovac 11S Max currently costs only $ 270, it cleans floors effectively. This is especially true when cleaning bare hardwood floors.
He was able to remove an average of 71% of our test sand from this type of surface. The bot did not work well with carpet cleaning, earning an average of 21% and 27% sand, respectively, at low pile and midpile.
And thanks to the basic navigation system of this vacuum, it took more than an hour to arrange our test room. As for the weather, that’s a lot. Still, Eufy uses his performance wisely. The vacuum covered the space well, cleaning and leaving almost no stains intact. The Eufy is also self-charging, so again you don’t have to worry about battery life or the factor that reflects the total cleaning time. This is the best robot vacuum for value. Read more.
How we test robot vacuum cleaners
Our method for estimating robot vacuums is clear, yet exhausting. There are two types of tests we perform. The first test is to understandwhile cleaning. We have built an industry-standard test room, as specified by the International Electrotechnical Commission, for this purpose. The IEC is an international standardization body responsible for managing robot test procedures, including vacuum manufacturers.
Inside this room, there are objects designed to simulate typical obstacles that the robot encounters for navigation while cleaning it. These obstacles include wall edges, table and chair legs, sofas and other furniture, etc., as well as bare tile and hardwood floors, and carpet.
We install LED lights at the top of each vacuum cleaner. The dimensions of the lights correspond to the measured width of the nozzle of each specific vacuum we test.
As the robots move around the room while cleaning, a camera on top captures an image with prolonged exposure of the entire room in low light. Then this photo will have a light trail created by the LEDs, which shows the exact areas where the robot traveled (and its position on the nozzle) during its execution. We can also see areas of the floor that the vacuum may have missed or become stuck.
You can see the navigation results of all robotic vacuum cleaners in our test group in the gallery below.
Some robotic vacuum cleaners have a better sense of direction than others
See all photos
The second type of test reveals exactly how many physical debris the vacuum can take from the floor. To mimic dirt with a small particle size, we use a mixture of play sand and landscaping sand. For larger soil particles we use grains of uncooked black rice. The robots then move in a straight line through three types of flooring (low-fiber carpet, medium-fiber carpet and bare hardwood floors).
We also control the specific nozzle width of each vacuum. We built an adjustable tool to contaminate our test floors. It allows us to lay a strip of precise soil area to match the nozzle dimensions for each robot. The mass of the soil is also not chosen at random. We measure a proportional amount related to the flooring material, the type of debris, plus the width of the nozzle of each vacuum.
We conduct three cleaning tracks (minimum) for each type of floor. We also perform separate tests for cleaning with sand and rice. This leads to at least 18 tests per robot vac. We weigh the robot’s dustbin both before and after each run. From there we can calculate the percentage of waste collection for each cleaning cycle and the average amount of soil that the machine manages to remove. In addition, we conduct anecdotal (visual) pet hair tests for each robot, on all three types of floors.
The graph below shows the fine particle cleaning efficiency data for all robot robots we tested. This should give you a pretty good idea of their cleaning of different types of flooring. Our test for medium-sized rice particles did not show enough difference between each detergent, which says that they can all handle larger particles without problems. We considered the removal of the fur for pet owners anecdotally.
Want more options for a robot vacuum cleaner? Here is a list of other vacuum cleaners we tested in addition to the models listed above.
More vacuum tips and tricks