The BIPA "does not contain" a definition of what it means to suffer injuries, the court said, and in "well-known" terms you have faced these damages only by violating the law. The court added that the whole law is to give consumers more control over when and how companies collect biometric data. If businesses can escape responsibility, as long as they do not cause tangible damage, your right to control privacy invents. "
The State Chamber of Commerce objected to the decision, claiming it would "open" for lawsuits that would harm the Illinois economy.
This is not necessarily the case. However, there is no doubt that the decision will have significant consequences. Google, Facebook, and others have faced court cases, accusing them of violating BIPA by tagging faces of photos without asking consumers. Google recently dismissed a photo case as the plaintiffs could not show that they had encountered "specific injuries", but that argument could not be retained after the Six Flags decision.