قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The Court of Appeal resumed the trial of Trump

The Court of Appeal resumed the trial of Trump



The retaliation cases were adjourned before pending summonses to the Trump Organization and a three-member panel dismissed a case by the District of Columbia and the Attorneys General of Maryland for unfair competition with the Trump International Hotel. [19659002] On Tuesday, the full 4th U.S. Court of Appeals voted to hear the case with a potential 15 judges or more on December 12 in Richmond, Virginia.

The District of Columbia and Maryland had previously claimed the Trump International Hotel in Washington harmed hotels and other state-owned businesses. Trump's victory in July killed the lawsuit before the state attorney general's offices collected financial information from the Trump organization and from Trump himself.

  What are the retaliations and is Trump taking them from foreign powers?

Trump applauded his legitimate victory on Twitter, writing: "I have won much of the deep state and Democrat-induced witch hunt." He noted that the decision of the Court of Appeals 3-0 was unanimous. When argued before these three appellate judges, they were particularly sympathetic to Trump. But Circuit's full panel may not be more evenly divided politically. They will check that the previous courts have correctly argued.

It is not uncommon for such a rehearsal in any court of appeal, even though the issue of retaliation is an extremely unusual case, since legal issues are almost never interpreted by the courts. ,

"A majority of judges who are in full-time active duty and who have not been disqualified have voted in a requested court inquiry to file an application for re-en banc. It is ordered to allow a retrial," the court wrote. . [19659003] United Kingdom Attorney General Carl Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh have ordered the reopening of the case "significant" on Tuesday.

"We look forward to substantiating our case before the full panel to stop President Trump from violating the Constitution and taking advantage of the presidency," the couple said in a statement.

Two other cases test Trump's compliance with the Constitution's remuneration clause, in New York and Washington, DC, still slowly moving through the courts.


Source link