Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ US https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The Supreme Court dropped the schedule arguments in House’s fight for Mueller’s documents

The Supreme Court dropped the schedule arguments in House’s fight for Mueller’s documents



On Friday, the US Supreme Court rejected a planned oral dispute in a parliamentary committee’s legal battle to obtain documents from Robert Mueller’s investigation into President Donald Trump’s special lawyer.

Respecting a request from lawyers for the House of Representatives, the court removed the argument, originally scheduled for December 2, from the calendar. The case involves a lawsuit filed by the Judicial Commission of the Chamber of Citizens in order to obtain documents related to Trump, compiled by Mueller’s special team.

In a letter to the court, House̵

7;s lawyers say they no longer need the documents – which the commission originally sought for an impeachment investigation – given Joe Biden’s victory in the presidential election.

“The new Congress will be convened in the first week of January 2021, and President-elect Biden will be inaugurated on January 20, 2021. Once these events occur, the newly formed committee will have to determine whether it wishes to continue to pursue the application for materials. to the grand jury that gave rise to this case, “the letter said.

The justice ministry said it was ready to continue the argument, as planned, before the court removed the case from the December calendar.

When Mueller’s work was completed in March 2019, the Department of Justice sent a version of its final report to Congress, but it edited or obscured references to information gathered by Mueller’s grand jury. The chamber’s judicial commission asked a federal judge for an order for the Ministry of Justice to submit an unedited copy of the report, along with some of the documents and interviews cited in the obscured items.

The proceedings of the federal grand jury are secret, including its findings and all materials generated during its investigations. But there are some exceptions. Courts have the right to allow disclosure when they find that the material will be used “in advance or in connection with legal proceedings.” Two lower courts have ruled that the Judicial Committee is covered by this exception, arguing that Parliament’s impeachment is preliminary to the Senate case, which is a judicial proceeding.

The Ministry of Justice upheld the exceptions to the rules of secrecy of grand jurors, which do not apply, saying “The usual meaning of ‘judicial proceedings’ is court proceedings, not impeachment proceedings before elected legislators.” But the Chamber said it was covered. by way of exception, noting that the Constitution states that the Senate has the sole power to “try” all impeachments, requires a chief judge to preside, and refers to a “decision” in cases of impeachment.

For now, the Supreme Court’s case remains alive, but will likely be dropped early next year.




Source link