Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The Trump administration has named Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism

The Trump administration has named Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism

Pompeo said the State Department had given Cuba a definition of “repeated support for acts of international terrorism in providing a safe haven for terrorists”, accusing the nation of abandoning its commitments made by President Barack Obama on the list of state sponsors of terrorism in 2015

A senior Cuban official responded, saying the United States was hypocritical.

The Trump administration’s move comes days before Biden took office, promising to revive Obama’s efforts to bring the two Cold War enemies closer together.

Cuba joins only three other countries on the list of state sponsors of terrorism ̵

1; Iran, North Korea and Syria. Sudan was recently abolished as part of an agreement to normalize relations with Israel.

Pompeo argues that “or for decades, the Cuban government has fed, housed and provided medical care for assassins, bomb makers and kidnappers, while many Cubans are hungry, homeless and without basic medicine.”

“Cuba is also hiding several American fugitives from justice who are wanted or convicted on charges of political violence, many of whom have lived in Cuba for decades,” he said.

The administration has not provided any evidence that Cuba has sponsored terrorist attacks. His justification for adding Cuba to the list contains overheated allegations that Cuba has had radicals since the 1970s, most of whom are now senior citizens, and ignores the fact that Cuba has played a crucial role in ending Colombia’s civil war. ; something the Obama administration applauded the communist-run island.

The definition is the culmination of Trump’s firm stance on Cuba, a position that was well received by Cuban Americans and other voters in Florida, but which diverted Obama’s efforts to break the tensions of the two nations in the 20th century.

This move imposes restrictions on US foreign aid, a ban on exports and defense sales, and imposes certain export controls and various financial restrictions. This could also lead to sanctions against individuals and countries involved in certain trade activities with Cuba.

A move criticized by diplomats

Cuba was removed from the state list of sponsors of terrorism in 2015 amid Obama’s efforts to restore ties between Washington and Havana. The Reagan administration designated Cuba in 1982, accusing the Castro government of sponsoring communist groups in Latin America and Africa.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parilla wrote on Twitter on Monday: “We condemn the hypocritical and cynical designation of #Cuba as the state sponsor of terrorism announced by the United States. The political opportunism of this action is recognized by all who sincerely worry about the scourge of terrorism his victims. “

The Trump administration is taking steps to designate Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism in the coming days
A U.S. diplomat with experience in Cuba told CNN last month that “there was simply no good argument that Cuba actually sponsored terrorism” when plans for change were first announced. “I don’t know anything that has changed in real terms since then – they’re just rethinking things to fit politics.”

Although the ruling is likely to be overturned by Biden’s incoming administration, the diplomat said it could cause “real damage to our confidence in state sponsorship of terrorism.”

William Leo Grande, a Latin American expert and professor at the American University, said that after entering the White House, Biden could quickly begin the process of removing Cuba from the list of terrorism again, and that the designation would have little practical impact as Cuba is already subject to broad US financial sanctions.

“Almost all the sanctions that a country suffers from being on the list of terrorism have already been imposed on Cuba as part of a wider embargo,” he said.

“The only real difference is that the presence on the list of terrorism makes the state vulnerable to being tried by private individuals for the consequences of so-called terrorist acts. You lose sovereign immunity if you are on the list of terrorism.”

Source link