Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The UN committee will consider allegations of Palestinian apartheid against Israel

The UN committee will consider allegations of Palestinian apartheid against Israel

The United Nations Arbitration Committee is ready to consider the Palestinian Authority’s complaint that Israel has committed acts of apartheid. The move comes as civil society accuses the Jewish state over the issue of apartheid by Israeli left-wing NGOs such as Yesh Dean and B’Celem and the American Human Rights Watch made headlines. Israel’s mission to the UN in Geneva made a scathing remark on Monday after the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) said on Friday that it planned to make progress on the issue. CERD “applies discriminatory standards against Israel to justify its outrageous decision on the admissibility of a politically motivated Palestinian complaint,”

; the mission said. The Palestinian Authority, by contrast, welcomed the decision issued on Friday, when the commission closed its session in April. The CERD is said to prove that “Israel’s racism and discrimination against the Palestinian people violate fundamental principles of international law and humanity as a whole.” The PA initially filed a complaint with the CERD on April 23, 2018. The issue would be resolved in 2020. but was delayed due to COVID-19.

The CERD is the oversight body of the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which entered into force in 1969. Its 18-member body inspects all states for compliance on a routine, rotational basis. It also assesses complaints of non-compliance. Both Israel and the PA have signed the convention prohibiting apartheid under Article 3. “States Parties in particular condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction.” specified in the convention. The PA complained to CERD that Israel did not comply with Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Convention. These are Israeli actions in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. CERD ROUTINELY examines Israel’s compliance with the convention, as it does with all signatories. Israel participated in all such reviews, the last of which took place in 2019. The Committee also reviewed compliance with Palestinian law in the same year. Israel has taken the CERD reviews seriously, as the committee is made up of a professional body and is largely presumed not to exhibit the same level of anti-Israel bias as the UN bodies, which are composed of representatives of Member States. The arbitration procedure is not part of the regulatory review, with an ad hoc five-member panel known as the Conciliation Commission appointed for consideration. On Friday, CERD said it had rejected Israel’s argument that the PA’s request should be rejected and plans to appoint one. commission. As early as 2019, CERD rejected an opinion in support of Israel by the UN legal advisory body that Palestine’s claim was inadmissible. The former Trump administration also spoke out against the PA’s claim. ‘After careful consideration, on 30 April 2021, with the non-participation of four members, the Committee decided to reject the exceptions made by the defendant as to admissibility. of interstate communication [by the PA]”Declare it.” It therefore requested its President to appoint, in accordance with Article 12 (1) of the Convention, the members of an ad hoc conciliation commission, which would make its good offices available to the States concerned with a view to resolving the matter amicably on the basis of party to the member states of the Convention “, said CERD. Israel replied that” despite the unequivocal finding of the UN Office of Legal Affairs that the Committee has no jurisdiction; despite the lack of contractual relations between Israel and the Palestinians; and, unlike its own practice in the past, the Committee determined (December 2019) that it had jurisdiction to deal with this false complaint. “Now the commission has decided that the proceedings on this issue can continue,” the Israeli mission said. decided to apply an operational standard to Israel and disregard both facts and laws in order to reach a predetermined and agenda-based conclusion, “he said. CERD hinted that it would not participate in the proceedings, but did not make this statement directly “In the light of the Committee’s shameless and biased decision, it is clear that Israel cannot expect fair and non-discriminatory treatment from this body and will accordingly conduct relations with it,” the mission said.

Source link