قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ The Union voted in the Tennessee Volkswagen plant could be historic

The Union voted in the Tennessee Volkswagen plant could be historic



Volkswagen Chattanooga began production of Atlas 2018.
Photo: VW
Morning Shift All the daily news of the car in a convenient location, Does your time more important? Volkswagen workers are probably united, rear seats are knocking and a lawsuit for lethal fluctuations is under way. T All this and still in "Tomorrow's Movement" on Friday, June 14, 2019.

1st Bandage: To Reunite or Not?

The United Workers' Union in the United Kingdom has significant influence in Detroit, representing workers at General Motors, Fiat Chrysler and Ford. But with foreign auto manufacturers, not so much. Workers at Chattanooga, Tennessee, the Volkswagen plant could soon change it.

This week, workers will vote to join. If the vote for the trade union passes, they will be the first plant to do so with the UAW to the south, Reuters reports, and the first in the US outside the big three. Mercedes, Toyota, BMW and Nissan resisted attempts to unite their headquarters in the south, backed by anti-trade union laws. (Jalopnik is proudly a trade union, and we and our sister are represented by America East Writers Guild.)

The Volkswagen plant, which is currently producing the Passat and Atlas, will see 1,700 workers voted. In 2014, workers voted against the trade union organization, albeit with "little difference", Reuters reported; Every success this time will be UAW's biggest victory over the years.

Those who support trade unions say there are "poor health and safety procedures, quality of life problems such as lasting changes in the timetable, insufficient rest time and small bonuses."

"Corruption is a problem for the UAW," said Menendez, the leader of the line team who made $ 23.50 per hour, and said that this is because of the Federal Investigation of Corruption in the UAW, which is a fair concern

"They are more interested in their own business than in the care of the people "

The vote began on Wednesday and will end tonight

Second Transmission: Avoid the Rear Seat If You Can

For a long time, the rear seat of the car is considered safer than the front. but now a new study reveals that the rear seat is no longer the safest place

This difference comes down to the safety belts. Advances in belt technology are in progress, but it has not always come to the rear belts, the New York Times reported. From the story:

If the belts with this better technology are not available in the backseat, people over the age of 55 should sit in front of newer vehicles with these more sophisticated belts, according to the National Administration traffic safety. Researchers say that the seat belts of most rear seats do not have the so-called load limiters, which means they can not be loosened. So, in frontal collision, the belt itself can cause injury to the chest, abdomen or spine, according to a new study by the Road Safety Institute and the Philadelphia Children's Hospital. Researchers are investigating frontal crashes that killed or seriously injured 117 passengers from the rear seats between the ages of 6 and 92.

This is especially important when it comes to companies that like to drive like Uber and Lyft, where people usually sit behind. The IIHS says it hopes to have a rear seat crash test by 2022 as it is not at the moment. Once this happens, this can encourage manufacturers to focus more on the safety of the rear seats. "The Times" notes that the rear seat "has not become more dangerous, the front seats have just become safer." Try to see the current models of load limiters and rear seatbacks

Third gear: Death hesitates

You've heard of death, are not you? This is a phenomenon that usually happens in rigid axles such as jeeps, "brutal and unmanageable swinging on the front wheels, which is usually triggered by a bump or, in some cases, a hard impact on the brake pedal ", and n Seed Jeepspert David Tracey wrote a while ago.This is quite well known in the Jeep community, and now FCA is facing a class action suit.Well

The claim is related to 2015 by 2018. Jeep Wranglers is filed Wednesday at the Detroit State Detroit District Court in the eastern Michigan region, according to Detroit News, who states that:

Fiat Chrysler knew about the question: "Instead of doing this – either to disclose it and / or to warned the drivers at the point of sale – FCA simply argued in the news that "death squint" was not a "safety issue" and that " to happen with any vehicle that has a solid front axle (not a separate front suspension), such as Wrangler. "

The case filed by Claire Reynolds, a New Jersey resident holding the 2018 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport 4 x 4, accuses the company of offering drivers a "Band-Aid fix" in the form of a replacement of the steering shock absorber if the vehicle is on bail.

The petition claims that the problem will eventually return and can be removed only with significant revisions and correction of the suspension. Reynolds claims the shock absorber has been replaced three times for six months and the front of the jeep is still shaken.

The case seeks compensation for the affected drivers in the form of a repurchase program that requires the FCA to pay drivers for defective vehicles and compensation for the loss of value of the vehicles. He also wants drivers to be fitted with spare vehicles while their repair is in progress.

The case also seeks criminal damages "for the FCA's fake fraud, which puts drivers and members of the public at national level at risk;" calls on regulators to order the company

The FCA told the department that it did not receive the complaint and therefore could not comment on the allegations, but noted that "any manufacturer equipped with a massive axle may experience vibration of the steering system and [19659907] Fourth gear: boredom

From what I've experienced while behind the assisted wheel of Tesla's autopilot and GM's Super Cruise, one of the problems is boredom. Once the original innovation disappears, you are bored with the steering wheel, as most of what you need to do (driving, stopping, gassing and removing gas) is no longer necessary. This boredom will simply spread, as autonomy progresses and becomes more widespread.

So, in order to entertain the drivers and other passengers in the car, Nissan, Audi and others want to use virtual reality experience and talk cartoon characters, according to Reuters. I'm still not quite sure how to feel about this, but tells me that maybe it's not a good idea!

From the story:

"As customers no longer need to drive … the question is what things we can offer to customers in this car," said Boris Meinsers, senior director of Digital Business in China, customers said to Reuters at the CES Asia Technology Fair in Shanghai this week.

The co-starter, co-founded by an Audi subsidiary, for example, demonstrates on the show how he wants to make travel journeys a virtual reality (VR) allowing passengers to swim with whales or sunken ships while on the road

When the vehicle accelerates or moves sideways, the movements are recorded by a computer installed in the car trunk, which adjusts the passenger's view of the VR goggles, respectively.

Japanese car maker Nissan presented a set of glasses for drivers and passengers who could provide real-time information and broadcast a talking cartoon character who communicated with the guest.

Of course, it sounds fun, but nowhere are we near enough to get completely autonomous cars on the road to be a problem. And even after this happens, how long will it take for the public to trust the cars enough to plunge into a VR world while moving around?

Companies say they recognize this, but also that "they have to start investing in the expectation that the vehicles will eventually benefit." Probably to stay ahead of the curve or something? I do not know.

If this VR car in the car eventually happens, you can bet it will come with advertisements and advertisements. Because this is a kind of hell-oriented, consumer-oriented reality in which we live.

Fifth gear: Volkswagen Trucks

Volvo owns Volvo Trucks and Volkswagen has Traton. The latter said today that he wants to offer 10% of his truck at the IPO, according to Reuters, which will cost up to 1.9 billion euros (approximately 2.1 billion dollars).

The German automaker said in a statement that the offer would be priced at 27-33 euros per share, which Jefferies analysts estimate as Traton at a slight discount for industrial partners but with a premium for Swedish competitor Volvo.

Invest the money you make from it in growing your portfolio of electric cars. Just earlier this week we announced that we can expect some autonomous cars from VW-Ford's partnership.

Volkswagen is really definite about the whole EV. I wonder why.

Back: RIP John Wulf

It is well known that the 24 hours of the Le Mans racing began with a permanent start at Le Mans (where drivers drove to their cars after the start of the race). But it changed after 1969 in Le Mans on June 14, when driver John Wulf crashed and died a few minutes after the cars got out because he did not fasten his seat belt.

“/>

thumbnail “/>
What is Le Mans' most incredible moment of video?

Le Mans is a test of man's stamina and the machine moves at the pace of a 3-hour sprint for 24 hours …

] Read more Read

Neutral: We're throwing a party this weekend!

Are you coming?


Source link