قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ World https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Today's Trump impeachment hearings will resonate over the centuries

Today's Trump impeachment hearings will resonate over the centuries



The fact that there is an impeachment process at all – and the debate over whether the president is so corrupt that he should be removed between elections – is in itself a kind of national tragedy. There is a reason why Gerald Ford called the Watergate scandal that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974, before he was formally impeached, a "long national nightmare."

The next few months will mark America for years to come. As the impersonators of Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson did before it, this process will reflect and intensify the ideological civil war that breaks national unity and threatens the nation's impetus.

Democratic leaders who have long resisted the demands of their party's liberal activists. to impeach Trump, they take a significant risk by embarking on this momentous constitutional path. Given the explosive revelations about Trump's behavior in Ukraine, they may have had little political choice.

In all likelihood, Republican senators will not vote for condemned and ousted Trump, opening up the possibility of political reaction, it's just not clear yet whether the Democrats or the GOP will turn out worse. Perhaps Trump views a possible escape from distrust as validating his unrestricted behavior and a license to continue testing constitutional customs.

The Trump case

  The case for and against the Presidential Impression of Donald Trump [1<div class="e3lan e3lan-in-post1"><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Text_Image -->
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
     style="display:block"
     data-ad-client="ca-pub-7122614041285563"
     data-ad-slot="2268374881"
     data-ad-format="auto"
     data-full-width-responsive="true"></ins>
<script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script></div>9659007] The case for and against the appointment of President Donald Trump

"I have always considered the strongest argument for impeachment the strongest argument against it, which is, if you do not impeach a president who is committed to this kind, what does that say to the next president about what they can do and the next Congress? "Home Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said in an interview on National Public Radio on Tuesday.

" At the same time, if you make an impeachment, but the president is justified, what does that say to the next president? The next congress? There's no good or simple answer ", he said.

Nevertheless, for the bitterness and insecurity it hinders, the impeachment process is also a confirmation and test of the democratic codes of self-government originally established in Philadelphia nearly two and a half centuries ago.

He will make the most significant decision so far for a lecherous presidency, which has already skipped past an existential scandal in Russia's election fraud scheme.

A Democratic accusation that could see Trump ashamed of being just the third most impressed president in history could hardly be more serious. He is effectively accused of committing a crime against the nation itself and the political system that safeguards its freedoms.

In particular, Democrats have accused Trump of conspiring with foreign powers to influence the US election, a crime that, according to many observers, meets the inevitable standard of "Treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdeeds."

to include crimes for campaign financing, the erosion of his presidential oath to uphold the law and the Constitution, and the alleged obstruction of witnesses and evidence. More symbolically, this would reinforce the fears of America's founders of one of the great threats to their democratic experiment.

"History and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most repugnant enemies of the Republican government," wrote the first President George Washington in his farewell address.

Democratic tactics

  How will the impeachment hearings work

They seek to change the political calculus of GOP senators at the moment, unlikely to abandon Trump and build a two-thirds majority to condemn him in the Senate process. If that does not happen, Trump may be so damaged by impeachment that his hopes of breaking beyond his base in 2020 will be doomed.

In essence, Democrats are seeking to build moments that can tell the story of the Scandal with Ukraine in simple words – just like the Senate Watergate hearings happened in the Nixon era.

It is unclear whether they have a witness to match the impact of former White House lawyer John Dean, who testified that he told Nixon that "there was cancer growing in the presidency." "

Democrats say Trump has built complex diplomatic efforts behind his back to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter and conspiracy theory that Kiev, not Russia, intervened in the election 2016, There are no reports of violations in Ukraine by any of Biden.

Democrats claim that the quid pro quos in this equation included $ 400 million in delayed military assistance to Ukraine and conditions initially imposed on the White House visit for its president Vladimir Zelensky. [19659020] A rough transcript of Trump's conversation with Zelensky in July – in which the US leader asked for a "favor" and mentioned Biden – is the heart of the case.

Democrats also gathered evidence that Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, grew in Europe, trying to strike a deal with Ukraine and bypassing US diplomats.

"Talk to Rudy, he knows everything about Ukraine," the GOP mega-donor addressed US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sundland, testifying that Trump told their subordinates.

Trump has refused to produce, or the Democrats have refused to embark on, long legal challenges to access, key witnesses who could establish or rule out any direct relationship with the president.

Yet White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvani has confirmed that he has been effective with Ukraine for military assistance in a stunning White House briefing – which includes the words "Overcome It."

In the end, the democratic appeal of the American people will be: Is it true that all this happened and Trump did not direct it – or at least knew all about it?

Republican Defense

  The Republican House lay outside Trump's central defense in a memorandum before the public impeachment hearings

After the scandal broke out with Ukraine, Republicans struggled to find consistent protection for the president.

His crude transcript of the conversation with Zelensky made him scarce, as far from perfect as Trump said he was.

A stream of leaking witness statements deepened. The Trump troupe can be. In response, the GOP is pushing for the disclosure of a report of abuse in the intelligence community, which raised concerns for the first time about Trump's call with Zelensky.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee are confident that they will set aside steps to thwart democratic hopes of presenting the public with a clear story.

Democrats have been fighting to stop previous high profile hearings from turning into circuses. This time, Schiff ruled that witnesses would first be questioned by professional attorneys on both sides – the least delay in political huts.

In a strategic announcement on Monday, GOP House members signaled that they would say there was no Trump-Zelensky coercion. They say the fact that military aid was eventually released in September means that there is no way to respond, and that initially Trump's skepticism about corruption in Ukraine has delayed him.

Every point is controversial. This may be one reason Trump despaired of discrediting the impeachment study, just as he did with the special investigation of Robert Mueller

. . the publicity and clarity of the fog.

Yet the impeachment hearing is such a deep moment that this time the President's normal weapons may not work so well.

"Republicans have relied on their defense for various techniques that do not address the allegations. They claim that this is a foregone investigation, that it is a witch hunt, "said Claire Finkelstein, faculty director at the University of Pennsylvania Law and Ethics Center.

The Republican approach is essentially a pledge, that their rhetoric of hurricane force would obscure the seriousness of the allegations being made public.

"There are some indications that this is us []] Once the public hearings begin, the public will focus on the actual allegations. "He says to Finkelstein.

This is exactly what happened to Nixon at the Watergate hearings."


Source link