- U.S. intelligence analysts learned last month that hacked emails from Ukraine’s Burisma Holdings would be dropped online as a “surprise in October,” according to The New York Times.
- Russian military intelligence hackers successfully hacked Burisma’s servers in January, The Times reported earlier this year.
- Wednesday’s report said analysts contacted people who knew about the hack because they were concerned that “Burisma material will leak along with fake material in an attempt to harm” the Democratic presidential candidate in 2020. Joe Biden
- Earlier Wednesday, a month after US intelligence learned of Russia̵
- As Business Insider reported, the authenticity of the Post article is very questionable and its supply raises many red flags.
- Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.
U.S. intelligence analysts learned last month that hacked emails from Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings would be downloaded online as a “surprise in October” in the 2020 U.S. election, The New York Times reported.
The news that Burisma had been hacked first surfaced in January. The Times then reported that the GRU, Russia’s main military intelligence agency, was responsible for the breach and that its hackers had been trying to gain access to Burisma’s servers since at least November last year.
After US intelligence learned in September of the plan to dispose of the stolen emails, analysts contacted “several people who know” about the Burisma hack, The Times reported.
The newspaper said analysts were concerned: “Burisma materials will leak along with forged materials in an attempt to harm Mr Biden’s candidacy.” Biden is currently running for president of the Democratic Party in 2020.
Earlier Wednesday, a month after US intelligence learned of plans to release hacked material, the New York Post published a dubious “gun smoking email” story between Biden’s son, Hunter, and Burisma’s top CEO
It says the email dates back to the time when the older Biden was vice president and Hunter Biden served on the board of Burism.
Trump and his allies used the report as evidence of allegations of corruption against Bidens, Burisma and the Ukrainian government.
But as Business Insider reports, the story includes a number of holes and red flags:
- The Post learned of the alleged emails from former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and received them from Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani.
- The story quotes an unidentified owner of a computer service who originally received the emails last year after an unidentified person removed a water-damaged laptop with a Beau Biden Foundation sticker but never took it.
- The store owner is said to have made a copy of the hard drive and provided it to Giuliani’s lawyer in December before handing it over to federal authorities, the article said.
- Business Insider identified the owner as John Paul Mac Isaac, an avid Trump supporter and conspiracy theorist who could not recall the timeline of events in the history of the Post, for which he was a major source.
- The Post recycled a number of false allegations about Bidens’ connection to Burisma, which were reinforced by Trump and others, even though they were debunked.
Some backgrounds: Trump, Giuliani and their supporters have repeatedly claimed that Joe Biden misused his power as vice president in 2016 to remove Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s attorney general, from office.
They say Shokin led a criminal investigation into Burism while Hunter was on board. In other words, they claimed that Biden used his office to protect his family’s personal interests.
But, as Business Insider reported last year, this theory has some important problems, not least the fact that Biden has represented the position of the US government, most of the West and institutions such as the International Monetary Fund in calling for Shokin’s shoot. .
The criticism of Shokin was that he did not pursue corruption strongly enough, not the other way around.
Burisma was also dormant at the time of Shokin’s downing, Bloomberg reported.
And according to The Wall Street Journal, government officials and Ukrainian anti-corruption activists say Shokin did obstruct the investigation of Burism long before Biden even entered the picture.
According to these reports, calling for Shokin’s dismissal, Biden did the opposite of what Trump had hinted at: He was increasing rather than decreasing the likelihood of investigating Burism.
The sequence of events surrounding the Burisma hacking resembles the Russian government’s hacking and dumping operation during the 2016 elections. Hillary Clinton.
Russian hackers then leaked emails through fake Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks, as well as WikiLeaks, which former CIA Director Mike Pompeo once described as a “tool” for the Russian government.
A U.S. security official told the Times in January that Russian hacking attempts against Burism “seem to run parallel” to Russian spy efforts in Ukraine to obtain materials that could embarrass candidates.
Zone 1, the cybersecurity firm that uncovered Burisma’s attacks, said in a report that Russian hacking techniques at the time had significant parallels with the 2016 DNC hacking.
Oren Falkowitz, co-founder of Zone 1 and a former National Security Agency official, told the Times that the hack looked like “a repeat of Russian interference in the last election.”
In the summer, the US intelligence community confirmed that the Russian government was once again interfering in the 2020 elections in an attempt to harm Biden’s campaign and boost Trump.