In response to a series of complaints from Republicans that the impeachment investigation against President Trump is confidential and one-sided, the lawyer for the anonymous signalman, who raised concerns about the presidents' relations with Ukraine, said Sunday that his client was ready to respond in writing
"Obviously, the House rules are respected by DEM," lawyer Mark Zaid tweeted. "But we are not."
The surprise proposal, made in rep. Devin Nunes, California, the state's most Republican member of the House Intelligence Committee, will allow Republicans to ask questions about the whistle that prompted an impeachment investigation without having to go through the committee chairman, respectively. Adam Schiff, D-California
Zaid, a longtime critic of Trump, tweeted that reporters would answer questions directly from Republican members "in writing, on oath and punishment for perjury," part of an effort to end the escalating efforts of Trump and his GOP allies to identify the person.
"Obviously, the rules of the GOP House are respected by DEMs. However, we are not."
Zaid, asked by Fox News, if Republicans reached, said there was" no substantial answer . "The Nunes Office did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.
ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER HAS A LONG HISTORY OF USE TO ADD THE LOWER TRAMP; A GOP source involved in the impeachment investigation told The Daily Beast on Sunday afternoon that the offer may not be sufficient. "I don't think we can put up with scripted interrogations," the source said. " We need a full account of his actions and how that was organized. "
Last September and Schiff, who has long insisted that the Trump team had illegally colluded with the Russians, had promised sworn testimony "very soon." But in recent weeks, he has changed course and suggested no testimony is needed. it turned out that the Schiff group had talked to the offender before the infringement complaint was filed, contrary to Schiff's previous allegations.
Trump has repeatedly demanded the release of the offender, saying on Sunday that the person "must come forward. "The signalman has raised concerns about Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, in which he suggested Zelensky review Joe and Hunter Biden there. The younger Biden regularly secured lucrative roles both domestically and abroad, with few relevant knowledge while his father was a powerful senator and later vice president.
The second whistle blow account provides a roadmap for House Democrats investigating whether the president and others in his orbit are pressuring Ukraine to study political and adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
"Unveil The Seeker of War" and End the "Imperial Scam!" Trump tweeted. , TREATMENT VERY GOOD
Trump later pressed the news media on Sunday to reveal the identity of the whistleblower of the events was incorrect.The complaining of whistleblowers was partly confirmed by first hand people about the events that have occurred or on the Capitol Hill, but key discrepancies also emerged.
For example, the complaint states that Trump made a "specific request that the Ukrainian leader discover and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and reviewed by the US cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike" – a request that did not appear in the classified file of the call made by the Trump administration.
"You know who he is. You know who he is. You just don't want to report it," Trump told reporters at the White House. "You know you would do a public service if you did."
USA. There are laws to signal people's identities and careers that have been charged with criminal misconduct by government officials, but many Republicans say – citing Justice Department officials – that it didn't happen during Trump's call nothing criminal.
Republicans allege he saw a political opportunity to expose a CIA official, which the intelligence community's inspector general said may have "controversial political biases."
VIDLBLAYER CHECKED THE FORM INDICATING THE "FIRST" KNOWLEDGE – ADDITIONAL CONCESSIONAL DOCUMENTS
but insisted that the contact included the role of politicians as "elected officials – not as candidates".
In October, Fox News reported that the whistleblower told the Inspector General of Intelligence (ICIG) that the prejudice was being developed t the president could be charged against him for a third, previously unregistered reason. Fox News previously reported that whistleblowers are registered Democrats and have a previous working history with a top Democrat, but the third potential indicator of bias remains unclear.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, California, said Sunday that he had not yet discussed the proposal for the Nunes whistle, but stressed that the person should answer questions publicly before the committee.
"When you talk about the removal of the President of the United States, the abolition of democracy, the abolition of this, the American public votes for, I think one should come to the commission," McCarthy told CBS News. "
" We need openness that people understand, "he added.
Zaid said his team had considered the issue of alleged bias with Republican committee members and emphasized the need for anonymity to maintain the safety of whistleblowers and this person's family, "but with little effect in stopping attacks."
Click here to get the application of FOX NEWS
"Let's be perfectly clear "Our desire for cooperation has not changed," Andrew tweeted P. Bakai, another lawyer representing the signal, "What we object to and deem offensive, however, is the effort to disclose the signalers."
Bakai wrote on Saturday that "their fixation on disclosing the identity of the offender is simply because they are at a loss as to how to handle the investigations that prompted disclosure. "
Chad Pergram of Fox News and The Associated Press contributed to this report.