Rand Paul has left no doubt where the mystery surrounding the abuser lies, with President Trump looking approvingly.
At a rally on Monday night in Lexington, the Kentucky senator thundered, "I say this evening to the media, do you do your job and print his name! "
Senator, this is not our job.
It is not the responsibility of the press to appoint a federal employee who complies with all rules to get ahead – or to do his dirty work.  The audience loved him but chanted "do your job!" And the president approved of what his rival did in 2016: "Aunt, that was great. He is a warrior. I always said it. "
THE CALLING PREPARATION FOR WRONG, HUMAN AND DEMOCRATIC
So why does Paul himself not reveal the name if he thinks he knows the identity of the investigator, the impeachment of the Chamber? It is not illegal for a legislator to disclose such a person, as long as he is not a disguised agent.
It seems to me that the answer is that Paul would have encountered a tremendous reaction to this. It is much better to pressure the press to take this controversial step.
In fact, the intruder was partially stopped by the New York Times, which describes him as a CIA employee assigned to the White House. I thought at the time that this narrowed the circle of suspects enough, that it was only a matter of time before the name ran out.
One of the offender attorneys, Mark Zaid, responded to Paul by telling the Washington Post: a member of Congress who calls for the identity of any legitimate offender to be publicly disclosed against their wishes, disgraces the position they occupy, and betrays the interests of The Constitution and the American people. "
Intel House Speaker Adam Schiff becomes increasingly concerned about protecting a man who filed a complaint about Trump's July call with the Ukrainian leader and is floating to get him to answer written questions.
The president rejected the idea with this ridiculous tweet: "November gave false information and dealt with the corrupt politician Schiff. It must be brought forward to give evidence. Written answers are not acceptable! ”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE HOWE BOOZMETER PODCEST MEDIA, RIF OF THE ACTUAL BEST STORIES OF THE DAY to sit. with Mueller's prosecutors and instead provided written answers.
Paul also requested that Joe Biden's son, who was at the center of Trump's efforts to lead Ukraine to investigate, be called before the impeachment hearings. "If Shiftie Schiff won't allow Hunter Biden to come and if he doesn't blow the whistle, every Republican in Congress has to walk around and say it's a farce," he said.
Politically, it is not difficult to understand why Republicans want to make the unknown complainant an issue. He told the Inspector General when he came out that he had a previous professional relationship with a Democrat in 2020 (probably Biden), and their goal was to paint him as a biased hack.
But in essence, the informant is largely irrelevant. He admitted in his complaint that he did not know firsthand about Trump's call, but reflected the concerns of other White House officials.
Several other current and former direct knowledge employees have substantially confirmed the billers' account and presented greater efforts by the Trump administration to use a presidential meeting as a lever in exchange for a Bidens Ukrainian probe and election elections through 201
"Paul's enthusiastic and almost continuous support for Trump's actions continues to push many libertarians – they hoped that Rand would be more like his father, the former rap. Ron Paul – and conservatives with limited management, for whom the Kentucky senator was a prime spot when the Tea Party movement showed promise and principles.
During his first Fox show, Sean Hannity said, "I actually have multiple confirmations of who the offender is, but do you know what? I will play the game for a while and accept the threats from the lawyers that they will judge me.
The Post reported that Republican lawmakers during the closed-door hearings asked questions about the abuser, who "were interpreted as trying to" mask the offender, "according to" several employees with direct knowledge of the depositions. "One GOP aide said it was a 'legitimate line of questioning' for the whistle and others," as their political preferences could tarnish the testimony and findings.
I don't know if the man's identity is a secret at this point. I think the publication of his name would send a chilling message to those who may whistle about future misconduct – and in democratic administrations – that their anonymity may not be protected.