I believe that people should decide what is reliable, not technology companies …. I believe that we must make mistakes on the part of free expression. "
The big picture: The scale and impact of Facebook turned into a light of day for political criticism in the US and around the world, especially after its news broadcast turned into a vector for targeted fraud during the 2016 election
Between the lines: The talk of free speech allows Zuckerberg to stand on a high moral ground ̵
Fighting misinformation: Facebook has found it more effective to identify and load false accounts than to try to limit false information, Zuckerberg said.
- ] "Focusing on authentication and account authentication is a much better solution than an ever-expanding definition of what's harmful. "
Political Advertisements: After Facebook launched ads from President Trump's campaign containing false statements about Democratic challenger Joe Biden, the company was asked to remove ads – or stop running political ads at all.
- ] Zuckerberg said he believed but dismissed the move: "From a business standpoint, the controversy is certainly not worth the small part of our business that they make up. But political ads are an important part of the vote – especially for local candidates, upcoming challenges and advocacy groups that may otherwise not receive much media attention. Prohibiting political advertising is for the benefit of the actors and anyone who reflects on the media. "
Zuckerberg identifies three threats to the free expression of the horizon: 1 China which "builds its own Internet, focused on many different values."
- Facebook, along with Instagram and its other services, does not function in China.
2. Platforms like Facebook: "The reality is that we make a lot of decisions that affect people's ability to speak … but we won't always get it on the right. "
- Zuckerberg cited Facebook's nascent efforts to create an independent supervisory board similar to the Supreme Court as one response.
3. Partisan politics:" We see people trying to identify more speech as dangerous because it may lead to political results that they consider unacceptable. Some believe that because the stakes are so high, they can no longer trust their fellow citizens with the power to communicate and decide what to believe for themselves. I personally think that is more dangerous for democracy in the long run than almost any speech.
" The conclusion: Zuckerberg hopes to position Facebook as the heir to the long liberal Western tradition of free speech
- " Giving everyone a voice empowers the powerless and drives society to be better Over time, "he says.
- This is an optimistic view that is aligned with the Silicon Valley ethos – and contrary to the rush of discontent with Facebook policies and actions that began with the Cambridge Analytica scandal .